Rubiolo v. National Passenger Railroad Corporation

Filing 41

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 10/12/2018. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

***

11

MILDRED RUBIOLO,

12

CASE NO. 5:17-cv-04698-NC

Plaintiff,

Complaint filed: 8/14/17
Trial Date: 3/4/19

13
vs.

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

14
15

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER
CORPORATION, a.k.a AMTRAK,

16
Defendants.
17
18
19

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, MILDRED RUBIOLO, and

20

Defendant, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (Amtrak), through their

21

respective counsel, the above-titled matter having been settled, that the Court dismiss the matter, with

22

prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party agrees to bear

23

their own fees and costs.

24

DATED: October 11, 2018

HILDEBRAND MCLEOD & NELSON, LLP

25
26
27

By _______________________________
PAULA RASMUSSEN, ESQ.
CHARLES S. BRACEWELL, ESQ.
Attorneys for plaintiff,
MILDRED RUBIOLO

28
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

1

DATED: October 11, 2018

FLESHER SCHAFF & SCHROEDER, INC.

2

/s/ JEREMY J. SCHROEDER
By _______________________________
JACOB D. FLESHER, ESQ.
JASON W. SCHAFF, ESQ.
JEREMY J. SCHROEDER, ESQ.
Attorneys for defendant,
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER
CORPORATION

3
4
5
6
7

14

R NIA

FO

LI

ER

H

13

NATHANEAL M. COUSINS s
usin
United States Magistrate. Judge
ael M Co
ge Nathan
Jud

RT

12

TED
GRAN
______________________________________

NO

11

Dated: ___________________
October 12, 2018

A

10

UNIT
ED

9

S

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT
U
O

8

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

C