Lantry v. Greystar Real Estate Partners
Filing
10
Order Adopting 5 Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Without Leave to Amend. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 10/4/2017. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/4/2017: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (iym, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
JOSIE HOWARD LANTRY,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
Case No. 17-CV-05267-LHK
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND
DISMISSING WITHOUT LEAVE TO
AMEND
v.
GREYSTAR REAL ESTATE PARTNERS,
Re: Dkt. No. 5
Defendant.
16
17
18
United States Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd has made a Report and Recommendation
19
that the District Judge dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
20
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) because it is frivolous and because it fails to state a claim upon which relief may
21
be granted. ECF No. 5. The Report and Recommendation was filed and served on September 19,
22
2017. No objections have been filed, and the time to file objections has expired. See Fed. R. Civ.
23
P. 72(b)(2).
24
Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as the record in this case, the
25
Court finds that the Report and Recommendation is well-founded in fact and in law and, therefore,
26
adopts the Report and Recommendation. The Court hereby DISMISSES Plaintiff’s complaint
27
without leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
28
1
Case No. 17-CV-05267-LHK
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
5
Dated: October 4, 2017
______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 17-CV-05267-LHK
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?