Cole v. Adam et al

Filing 41

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL by Judge Beth Labson Freeman.Granting 38 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply as to 34 Objection.Reply due by 9/30/2018. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2018) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/17/2018: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tshS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

ROBERT HUGH COLE,
United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Plaintiff,
v.

13
14
15

NANCY ADAM, et al.,

Case No. 17-05691 BLF (PR)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO
FILE REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO
COMPEL

Defendants.
(Docket No. 38)

16
17
18

Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to

19

42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical officials at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”). The

20

Court found cognizable Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims based on his allegations of

21

inadequate medical care. (Docket No. 9.) Defendants filed a motion for summary

22

judgment on June 7, 2018. (Docket No. 19.) On August 8, 2018, Plaintiff filed an

23

opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and a motion to compel. (Docket

24

No. 30.) On August 29, 2018, Defendants filed a reply in support of the motion for

25

summary judgment, (Docket No. 33), and an opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to compel,

26

(Docket No. 34).

27
28

Plaintiff has filed a request to “extend time to reply to Defendants’ opposition to

1

motion to compel.” (Docket No. 38.) Plaintiff declares that as of September 5, 2018, he

2

had not received a copy of Defendants’ opposition to his motion to compel and therefore is

3

unable to prepare a reply. (Docket No. 38-1 at 3.)

4

Having shown good faith, Plaintiff’s request is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file a

5

reply to his motion to compel no later than September 30, 2018. In the interest of

6

justice, the Clerk is directed to enclose a copy of Defendants’ opposition (Docket No. 34),

7

with a copy of this Order.

8

This order terminates Docket No. 38.

9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

September 17, 2018
Dated: _____________________

________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Order Granting EOT to File Reply to Defs’ Opp. Mot.
PRO-SE\BLF\CR.17\05691Cole_eot-reply-mtc

25
26
27
28

2