Perdomo v. Plumber
Filing
39
ORDER DENYING SECOND MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Denying 38 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2019) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/10/2019: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tshS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CARLOS PERDOMO,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
Case No. 17-06962 BLF (PR)
ORDER DENYING SECOND
MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF
COUNSEL
S.V.S.P., et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
(Docket No. 38)
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a complaint pursuant to
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials at the Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”).
19
Plaintiff has filed a second motion and declaration requesting appointment of counsel.
20
(Docket No. 38) Plaintiff declares he lacks income to employ counsel, he has limited
21
access to the law library, and he has no education in the law. (Id.)
22
Plaintiff does not provide the Court with any new information that he did not
23
present in his first motion for appointment of counsel, (Docket No. 24), and his reasons are
24
no different from those posed by other pro se prisoner litigants. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s
25
motion is DENIED without prejudice for lack of exceptional circumstances. See Agyeman
26
v. Corrections Corp. of America, 390 F.3d 1101, 1103 (9th Cir. 2004); Rand, 113 F.3d at
27
1525 (9th Cir. 1997); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wilborn v.
28
Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986).
1
This order terminates Docket No. 38.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: _October 10, 2019_
________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order Denying Second Motion for Appointment of Counsel
P:\PRO-SE\BLF\CR.17\06962Perdomo_deny.atty2.docx
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?