Kannan v. Apple Inc.
Order re Apple's Document Production and Rule 30(b)(6) Depositions. Signed by Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 10/2/2019. (vkdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2019)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No.17-cv-07305-EJD (VKD)
ORDER RE APPLE’S DOCUMENT
PRODUCTION AND RULE 30(B)(6)
On October 2, 2019, the Court amended the deadlines for defendant Apple Inc. to produce
certain categories of information as it represented in its October 2, 2019 notice to the Court. Dkt.
No. 134. After the Court issued its order, plaintiff Raja Kannan objected to Apple’s request for an
extension of time to complete its production. Dkt. No. 135. In particular, Mr. Kannan expresses
concern that his counsel may not receive Apple’s documents in time to prepare for certain
depositions, including depositions noticed pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6).
If Apple does not produce documents sufficiently in advance of the scheduled depositions
to permit Mr. Kannan’s counsel to use those documents in the depositions, Apple may be required
to reproduce its witnesses for further deposition and may be required to bear both its own and Mr.
Kannan’s fees and costs for such further deposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 2, 2019
VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?