Kannan v. Apple Inc.

Filing 136

Order re Apple's Document Production and Rule 30(b)(6) Depositions. Signed by Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 10/2/2019. (vkdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 RAJA KANNAN, Plaintiff, 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Case No.17-cv-07305-EJD (VKD) ORDER RE APPLE’S DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND RULE 30(B)(6) DEPOSITIONS v. APPLE INC., Defendant. 13 On October 2, 2019, the Court amended the deadlines for defendant Apple Inc. to produce 14 certain categories of information as it represented in its October 2, 2019 notice to the Court. Dkt. 15 No. 134. After the Court issued its order, plaintiff Raja Kannan objected to Apple’s request for an 16 extension of time to complete its production. Dkt. No. 135. In particular, Mr. Kannan expresses 17 concern that his counsel may not receive Apple’s documents in time to prepare for certain 18 depositions, including depositions noticed pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6). 19 If Apple does not produce documents sufficiently in advance of the scheduled depositions 20 to permit Mr. Kannan’s counsel to use those documents in the depositions, Apple may be required 21 to reproduce its witnesses for further deposition and may be required to bear both its own and Mr. 22 Kannan’s fees and costs for such further deposition. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 2, 2019 25 26 27 28 VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?