Kannan v. Apple Inc.

Filing 190

Order re Discovery Disputes. Discovery Hearing re 184 Joint Discovery Letter Brief re Plaintiff's Failure to Produce Documents Related to His App Development and His Family's Time in India set for 11/20/2019 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor before Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Signed by Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 11/12/2019. (vkdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2019)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

SAN JOSE DIVISION

7
8

RAJA KANNAN,
Plaintiff,

9

United States District Court
Northern District of California

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTES

v.

10
11

Case No. 17-cv-07305-EJD (VKD)

Re: Dkt. No. 184
APPLE INC.,
Defendant.

12
13
14

The Court will hear argument on the parties’ discovery dispute concerning plaintiff Raja

15

Kannan’s compliance with the Court’s prior order regarding production of documents related to

16

Mr. Kannan’s software development activities and his family’s time in India (Dkt. No. 184) on

17

November 20, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2, Fifth Floor, 280 South First Street, San Jose,

18

California 95113. If the parties file a discovery dispute letter concerning defendant Apple Inc.’s

19

designation of documents as Attorneys’ Eyes Only by November 18, 2019 as previously stipulated

20

(Dkt. No. 178), the Court will also hear argument on that dispute on November 20.
Fact discovery in this case closed on October 31, 2019. Dkt. No. 125 at 2 (“The deadline

21
22

for completing fact discovery shall be continued thirty days until October 31, 2019. This

23

extension does not include promulgation of additional discovery requests.”). Pursuant to Civil

24

Local Rule 37-3, no motions to compel discovery may be filed more than seven days after the

25

close of fact discovery—i.e., November 7, 2019. That date has now passed. The parties may not

26

extend this deadline by mutual agreement. The Court will not entertain any other motions to

27

compel discovery, save for motions that concern compliance with the Court’s prior discovery

28

orders.

1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 12, 2019

3
4
VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI
United States Magistrate Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2