Kannan v. Apple Inc.
Filing
289
Order granting 283 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages and setting briefing schedule for cross motions for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on July 1, 2020.The hearing on these motions is CONTINUED to August 27, 2020 at 11: 00 a.m. The trial setting conference set for August 13, 2020 is also CONTINUED to August 27, 2020 at 11:00 a.m.(ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
8
RAJA KANNAN,
Case No. 5:17-cv-07305-EJD
Plaintiff,
9
13
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE EXCESS PAGES FOR
ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT; SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR CROSS-MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
CONTINUING TRIAL SETTING
CONFERENCE
14
Re: Dkt. No. 283
v.
10
11
APPLE INC.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendant.
12
15
On June 25, 2020, Defendant filed a motion for leave to file excess pages for its motion for
16
summary judgment. Dkt. 283. After finding good cause and after having considered Plaintiff’s
17
objection, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s request for leave to file 5 excess pages. Plaintiff may
18
also file 5 excess pages in his opening brief, i.e., his combined motion for summary judgment/his
19
opposition.
20
The Court also directs the Parties to the undersigned’s standing order, which instructs
21
parties on this Court’s cross motion requirement. See Judge Edward J. Davila Standing Order for
22
Civil Cases V.C. Both Plaintiff and Defendant have indicated an intent to file summary judgment
23
motions. The Parties must comply with this Court’s standing order. However, the Court finds it
24
would be more effective and provide Plaintiff with more time if Defendant filed the opening brief
25
instead of Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Court orders as follows:
26
27
28
Case No.: 5:17-cv-07305-EJD
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
EXCESS PAGES FOR ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; CONTINUING TRIAL
SETTING CONFERENCE
1
1
2
3
1. By July 2, 2020, Defendant must file its motion for summary judgment which shall not
exceed 30 pages in length.
2. By July 16, 2020, Plaintiff must file his combined motion for summary judgment/his
4
opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment which shall not exceed 30 pages
5
in length.
6
7
8
9
3. By July 30, 2020, Defendant must file its opposition/reply brief which shall not exceed 15
pages in length.
4. By August 6, 2020, Plaintiff must file his reply brief which shall not exceed 15 pages in
length.
5. The hearing on these motions is CONTINUED to August 27, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. The trial
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
setting conference set for August 13, 2020 is also CONTINUED to August 27, 2020 at
12
11:00 a.m.
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
16
Dated: July 1, 2020
______________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.: 5:17-cv-07305-EJD
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
EXCESS PAGES FOR ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; CONTINUING TRIAL
SETTING CONFERENCE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?