Bahcevan v. Intel Corporation

Filing 21

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation and Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of Oregon and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Michael H. Simon (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2018)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: INTEL CORP. CPU MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2828 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO 1) On April 5, 2018, the Panel transferred 4 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the District of Oregon for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See _F.Supp.3d_ (J.P.M.L. 2018). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been transferred to the District of Oregon. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Michael H. Simon. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the District of Oregon and assigned to Judge Simon. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of Oregon for the reasons stated in the order of April 5, 2018, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Michael H. Simon. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7 day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. FOR THE PANEL: Apr 18, 2018 Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel 04/18/2018 3 IN RE: INTEL CORP. CPU MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION SCHEDULE CTO 1 DIST DIV. MDL No. 2828 TAG ALONG ACTIONS C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION 18 00357 West et al v. Intel Corporation ALABAMA NORTHERN ALN 3 CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN CAN CAN CAN CAN CAN CAN CAN CAN CAN CAN CAN CAN CAN CAN CAN 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 00105 00111 00146 00187 00210 00235 00298 00352 00379 00580 00633 00742 00799 00894 01216 01461 Carl Jones v Intel Corp Rinn et al v. Intel Corporation West v. Intel Corporation, a Delaware corporation Bahcevan v. Intel Corporation Dean et al v. Intel Corporation Lee v. Intel Corporation Zog, Inc. v. Intel Corporation Pascarella et al v. Intel Corporation Mechri et al v. Intel Corporation Sterling v. Intel Corporation Young v. Intel Corporation, a Delaware corporation Park v. Intel Corporation Ferrer v. Intel Corporation City of Providence v. Intel Corp. Artesia General Hospital, et al. v. Intel Corporation Fooshee et al v. Intel Corporation ILLINOIS CENTRAL ILC 2 18 02009 Murphy et al v. Intel Corporation 1 18 00540 ROBBINS v. INTEL CORPORATION 1 18 00051 Storey et al v. Intel Corporation NEW JERSEY NJ NEW MEXICO NM NEW YORK EASTERN NYE NYE 1 2 18 00526 18 00147 NYE 2 18 00574 Bernstein et al v. Intel Corporation Rosenberg et al v. Intel Corporation United Food and Commercial Workers International Union Local 1500 v. Intel Corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?