Traylor v. Berryhill, Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
12
ORDER REQUIRING GOVERNMENT TO FILE ANSWER AND CERTIFIED COPY OF TRANSCRIPT AND ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD WITHIN 14 DAYS; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 8/14/2018. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2018)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
SAN JOSE DIVISION
6
7
JEROME LEWIS TRAYLOR,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 18-cv-00445-BLF
v.
NANCY BERRYHILL,
Defendant.
ORDER REQUIRING GOVERNMENT
TO FILE ANSWER AND CERTIFIED
COPY OF TRANSCRIPT OF
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD WITHIN
14 DAYS; SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
12
13
14
Plaintiff Jerome Lewis Traylor (“Plaintiff”) filed a social security complaint on January 19,
2018. See ECF 1. The U.S. Attorney’s Office was served on March 13, 2018. See ECF 9.
15
Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 16-5, the government was required to file an answer, together with a
16
certified copy of the administrative record, within 90 days of receipt of service of the summons
17
and complaint. The government’s answer was due on June 11, 2018. To date, the government has
18
not filed its answer or a certified copy of the administrative record. The government is thus
19
delinquent. The government is hereby ORDERED to file its answer and a certified copy of the
20
administrative record by August 28, 2018. Plaintiff must file his motion for summary judgment
21
22
23
within 28 days of receipt of the government’s answer. The government must serve and file any
opposition or counter-motion within 28 days of service of Plaintiff’s motion. Plaintiff may serve
and file a reply within 14 days of service of the government’s opposition or counter-motion.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated: August 14, 2018
26
27
28
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?