Lone Star Targeted Advertising LLC v. Cadent Technology et al

Filing 18

ORDER Re 17 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice. THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THE FILE. All deadlines/hearings are terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/24/2018. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2018)

Download PDF
5/24/2018 N 7 8 D IS T IC T R R NIA a LI ER J. D a v i l FO S Attorneys for Plaintiff Lone Star Targeted Advertising, LLC d w a rd Judge E H 6 RT 5 NO 4 VED APPRO A 3 UNIT ED 2 John Lee, SBN 229911 Jennifer Ishimoto, SBN 211845 Banie & Ishimoto LLP 3705 Haven Ave., #137 Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: 650-241-2774 Email: jlee@banishlaw.com ishimoto@banishlaw.com RT U O 1 S DISTRICT TE C TA OF C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 LONE STAR TARGETED ADVERTISING, LLC, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 CASE NO. 5:18-cv-00764 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) v. CADENT TECHNOLOGY and CROSS MEDIAWORKS, LLC, Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Lone Star Targeted Advertising, LLC v. Cadent Technology, et al., Case No. NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 2 Plaintiff Lone Star Targeted Advertising (“LSTA”), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 3 41(a)(1)(A)(i) hereby gives notice that it is dismissing all claims in the above-captioned action 4 against Cadent Technology and Cross MediaWorks, LLC WITH PREJUDICE, subject to the 5 terms of a settlement agreement entered into between the parties, with each party to bear its own 6 costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees. 7 8 Dated: May 23, 2018 /s/John A. Lee John A. Lee Attorney for Plaintiff Lone Star Targeted Advertising, LLC 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Lone Star Targeted Advertising, LLC v. Cadent Technology, et al., Case No. NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?