City of Providence v. Intel Corp.
Filing
20
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation and Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of Oregon and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Michael H. Simon (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2018)
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: INTEL CORP. CPU MARKETING, SALES
PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION
MDL No. 2828
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO 1)
On April 5, 2018, the Panel transferred 4 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the
District of Oregon for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1407. See _F.Supp.3d_ (J.P.M.L. 2018). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been
transferred to the District of Oregon. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been
assigned to the Honorable Michael H. Simon.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the District of Oregon and assigned to Judge Simon.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the
District of Oregon for the reasons stated in the order of April 5, 2018, and, with the consent of that
court, assigned to the Honorable Michael H. Simon.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the District of Oregon. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7
days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel
within this 7 day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
FOR THE PANEL:
Apr 18, 2018
Jeffery N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel
04/18/2018
3
IN RE: INTEL CORP. CPU MARKETING, SALES
PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION
SCHEDULE CTO 1
DIST
DIV.
MDL No. 2828
TAG ALONG ACTIONS
C.A.NO.
CASE CAPTION
18 00357
West et al v. Intel Corporation
ALABAMA NORTHERN
ALN
3
CALIFORNIA NORTHERN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
00105
00111
00146
00187
00210
00235
00298
00352
00379
00580
00633
00742
00799
00894
01216
01461
Carl Jones v Intel Corp
Rinn et al v. Intel Corporation
West v. Intel Corporation, a Delaware corporation
Bahcevan v. Intel Corporation
Dean et al v. Intel Corporation
Lee v. Intel Corporation
Zog, Inc. v. Intel Corporation
Pascarella et al v. Intel Corporation
Mechri et al v. Intel Corporation
Sterling v. Intel Corporation
Young v. Intel Corporation, a Delaware corporation
Park v. Intel Corporation
Ferrer v. Intel Corporation
City of Providence v. Intel Corp.
Artesia General Hospital, et al. v. Intel Corporation
Fooshee et al v. Intel Corporation
ILLINOIS CENTRAL
ILC
2
18 02009
Murphy et al v. Intel Corporation
1
18 00540
ROBBINS v. INTEL CORPORATION
1
18 00051
Storey et al v. Intel Corporation
NEW JERSEY
NJ
NEW MEXICO
NM
NEW YORK EASTERN
NYE
NYE
1
2
18 00526
18 00147
NYE
2
18 00574
Bernstein et al v. Intel Corporation
Rosenberg et al v. Intel Corporation
United Food and Commercial Workers International
Union Local 1500 v. Intel Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?