Fooshee et al v. Intel Corporation

Filing 14

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to The District of Oregon. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2018)

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: INTEL CORP. CPU MARKETING, SALES
PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION

MDL No. 2828

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −1)

On April 5, 2018, the Panel transferred 4 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the
District of Oregon for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1407. See _F.Supp.3d_ (J.P.M.L. 2018). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been
transferred to the District of Oregon. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been
assigned to the Honorable Michael H. Simon.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the District of Oregon and assigned to Judge Simon.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the
District of Oregon for the reasons stated in the order of April 5, 2018, and, with the consent of that
court, assigned to the Honorable Michael H. Simon.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the District of Oregon. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7
days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel
within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

Apr 18, 2018
Jeffery N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel
C rf do e t e n cr c
e ie tb ar ad or t
ti
u
e
cp o oi nlidnh Dsi
oy f r i fe it s ir t
ga l
i tc
D t :04/18/2018
ad
e
MA YL MO A , l ko C ut
R . R N Ce f o r
r
US Dsi C utf r o
.. ir t oro O e n
tc
g
B:
y

/s/ D. St. Germain

Pgs
ae

1

T ruh
hog

3

IN RE: INTEL CORP. CPU MARKETING, SALES
PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION

MDL No. 2828

SCHEDULE CTO−1 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST

DIV.

C.A.NO.

CASE CAPTION

18−00357

West et al v. Intel Corporation

ALABAMA NORTHERN
ALN

3

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN

5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

18−00105
18−00111
18−00146
18−00187
18−00210
18−00235
18−00298
18−00352
18−00379
18−00580
18−00633
18−00742
18−00799
18−00894
18−01216
18−01461

Carl Jones−v−Intel Corp
Rinn et al v. Intel Corporation
West v. Intel Corporation, a Delaware corporation
Bahcevan v. Intel Corporation
Dean et al v. Intel Corporation
Lee v. Intel Corporation
Zog, Inc. v. Intel Corporation
Pascarella et al v. Intel Corporation
Mechri et al v. Intel Corporation
Sterling v. Intel Corporation
Young v. Intel Corporation, a Delaware corporation
Park v. Intel Corporation
Ferrer v. Intel Corporation
City of Providence v. Intel Corp.
Artesia General Hospital, et al. v. Intel Corporation
Fooshee et al v. Intel Corporation

2

18−02009

Murphy et al v. Intel Corporation

1

18−00540

ROBBINS v. INTEL CORPORATION

1

18−00051

Storey et al v. Intel Corporation

ILLINOIS CENTRAL
ILC
NEW JERSEY
NJ
NEW MEXICO
NM

NEW YORK EASTERN
NYE
NYE

1
2

18−00526
18−00147

NYE

2

18−00574

Bernstein et al v. Intel Corporation
Rosenberg et al v. Intel Corporation
United Food and Commercial Workers International
Union Local 1500 v. Intel Corporation