Carlucci, et al. v. Consolidated Networks Corporation et al
Filing
40
STIPUATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/1/2019. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
TOMAS E. MARGAIN, Bar No. 193555
HUY TRAN, Bar No. 288196
Justice at Work Law Group
84 West Santa Clara Street, Suite 790
San Jose, CA 95113
Telephone: (408) 317-1100
Facsimile: (408) 351-0105
Tomas@JAWLawGroup.com
Huy@JAWLawGroup.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
VINCENT CARLUCCI and LAMAR WASHINGTON
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
VINCENT CARLUCCI, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
13
16
CONSOLIDATED NETWORKS
CORPORATION, et al
Defendants.
17
18
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO DISMISS WITH
PREJUDICE
v.
14
15
Case No. 18-CV-01610-NC
TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES WHO HAVE MADE AN APPEARANCE:
19
20
The parties hereby stipulate as follows:
21
22
23
WHEREAS, the parties participated in mediation with JOHN KOEPPEL through this Court’s
ADR Program, and
WHEREAS, the mediation was successful, resulting in amicable resolution between all
24
25
26
27
parties,
IT IS THEREFORE JOINTLY REQUESTED AND STIPULATED that the matter be
dismissed in its entirety with prejudice.
28
1
Case No. 18-CV-01610-NC
STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
1
2
3
4
5
Dated: May 1, 2019
By:
/s/ Huy Tran
Huy Tran
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Dated: May 1, 2019
By:
/s/ Carrie Bushman
Carrie Bushman
Attorney for Defendants
6
7
8
9
10
11
ORDER
12
13
By:
NO
18
RT
19
thanael
Judge Na
ER
21
s
A
H
20
M. Cousin
FO
17
R NIA
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
TED
GRAN
LI
May 1, 2019
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
16
Dated:
S
15
ORDERED.
UNIT
ED
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 18-CV-01610-NC
STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?