Carlucci, et al. v. Consolidated Networks Corporation et al

Filing 40

STIPUATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/1/2019. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 TOMAS E. MARGAIN, Bar No. 193555 HUY TRAN, Bar No. 288196 Justice at Work Law Group 84 West Santa Clara Street, Suite 790 San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 317-1100 Facsimile: (408) 351-0105 Tomas@JAWLawGroup.com Huy@JAWLawGroup.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs VINCENT CARLUCCI and LAMAR WASHINGTON 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 VINCENT CARLUCCI, et al., Plaintiffs, 13 16 CONSOLIDATED NETWORKS CORPORATION, et al Defendants. 17 18 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE v. 14 15 Case No. 18-CV-01610-NC TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES WHO HAVE MADE AN APPEARANCE: 19 20 The parties hereby stipulate as follows: 21 22 23 WHEREAS, the parties participated in mediation with JOHN KOEPPEL through this Court’s ADR Program, and WHEREAS, the mediation was successful, resulting in amicable resolution between all 24 25 26 27 parties, IT IS THEREFORE JOINTLY REQUESTED AND STIPULATED that the matter be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. 28 1 Case No. 18-CV-01610-NC STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE 1 2 3 4 5 Dated: May 1, 2019 By: /s/ Huy Tran Huy Tran Attorney for Plaintiffs Dated: May 1, 2019 By: /s/ Carrie Bushman Carrie Bushman Attorney for Defendants 6 7 8 9 10 11 ORDER 12 13 By: NO 18 RT 19 thanael Judge Na ER 21 s A H 20 M. Cousin FO 17 R NIA NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge TED GRAN LI May 1, 2019 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O 16 Dated: S 15 ORDERED. UNIT ED 14 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO N F D IS T IC T O R C 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 18-CV-01610-NC STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?