Rogers et al v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

Filing 10

Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re 13-CV-1920-EJD; 18-CV-2197-EJD. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 4/26/18. (lhklc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 KAREN LOWE, et al., Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 Case Nos. 18-CV-02205-LHK, 18-CV02221-LHK SUA SPONTE REFERRAL FOR DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP OF CASES v. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., Defendant. 16 17 18 DONNA WALLACE OBLOJ, et al., Plaintiffs, 19 v. 20 21 INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., Defendant. 22 23 In accordance with Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the above captioned cases are hereby referred 24 to United States District Judge Edward Davila to determine whether they are related to No. 13- 25 CV-01920-EJD, In re Intuitive Surgical Securities Litigation, or No. 18-CV-2197-EJD, Rogers v. 26 Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. 28 1 Case Nos. 18-CV-02205-LHK, 18-CV-02221-LHK SUA SPONTE REFERRAL FOR DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP OF CASES 1 2 3 4 Dated: 4/26/2018 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case Nos. 18-CV-02205-LHK, 18-CV-02221-LHK SUA SPONTE REFERRAL FOR DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP OF CASES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?