County of Monterey v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al

Filing 8

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO..31)Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on MultidistrictLitigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Ohio for the reasons stated in the order of December 5, 2017, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Polster. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2018)

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE
LITIGATION

MDL No. 2804

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO 31)

On December 5, 2017, the Panel transferred 62 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for
the Northern District of Ohio for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1407. See 290 F.Supp.3d 1375 (J.P.M.L. 2017). Since that time, 619 additional action(s)
have been transferred to the Northern District of Ohio. With the consent of that court, all such
actions have been assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Polster.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Ohio and assigned to Judge
Polster.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the
Northern District of Ohio for the reasons stated in the order of December 5, 2017, and, with the
consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Polster.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be
stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7 day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:
May 24, 2018

Jeffery N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel
I hereby certify that this instrument is a true and correct
copy of the original on file in my office.
Attest: Sandy Opacich, Clerk
U.S. District Court
Northern District of Ohio
By:
Deputy Clerk

IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE
LITIGATION

SCHEDULE CTO 31

DIST

DIV.

MDL No. 2804

TAG ALONG ACTIONS

C.A.NO.

CASE CAPTION

18 00708

St. Clair County, Alabama v. Actavis LLC et al

ALABAMA NORTHERN
ALN

4

CALIFORNIA EASTERN
CAE

1

18 00626

CAE

1

18 00630

CAE

2

18 01135

CAE

2

18 01137

County of Mariposa, et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
County of Tuolumne, et al v. Amerisource Bergen Drug
Corporation et al
County of Sacramento v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
County of Lassen v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN
CAN

5

18 02693

County of Monterey v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al

CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN
CAS

18 00882

County of San Diego et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al

1

18 00086

ALACHUA COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA LP et al

2

18 08845

BERGEN COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al

3

FLORIDA NORTHERN
FLN
NEW JERSEY
NJ

WASHINGTON WESTERN
WAW

3

18 05361

Clallam County v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al