Google LLC v. Kydia Inc.
Filing
80
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF THE CASE UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 41(A)(1)(A)(II) 79 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 6/5/2019. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
COOLEY LLP
WHITTY SOMVICHIAN (194463)
(wsomvichian@cooley.com)
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone: (415) 693-2000
Facsimile: (415) 693-2222
SYVERSON, LESOWITZ & GEBELIN LLP
Scott Lesowitz (261759)
(scott@syversonlaw.com)
8383 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 520
Beverly Hills, California 90211
T: (310) 341-3076
COOLEY LLP
BRENDAN J. HUGHES
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
(bhughes@cooley.com)
REBECCA GIVNER-FORBES
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
(rgf@cooley.com)
1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ste. 700
Washington, DC 20004
Telephone: (202) 842 7800
Facsimile: (202) 842 7899
Attorney for Defendant Kydia Inc.
Attorneys for Plaintiff Google LLC
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN JOSE DIVISION
15
16
17
GOOGLE LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
18
Plaintiff,
19
20
21
22
Case No. 18-cv-03047-NC
STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF THE CASE
UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 41(A)(1)(A)(II)
v.
KYDIA INC. D/B/A BEYONDMENU, an
Illinois corporation, and DOES 1-20,
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
STIPULATION TO DISMISS
CASE NO. 18-CV-03047-NC
STIPULATED DISMISSAL
1
2
Plaintiff Google LLC (“Google”) and Defendant Kydia Inc. d/b/a BeyondMenu (“Kydia”), by
3
and through their undersigned counsel, hereby notify the Court that they have agreed to a settlement
4
agreement relating to Google’s claims, which was fully executed on June 3, 2019 (the “Settlement
5
Agreement”).
6
Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Google and Kydia hereby stipulate under Federal Rule
7
of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) that the complaint in this matter be dismissed without prejudice and
8
subject to Google’s ability to seek enforcement of the Settlement Agreement as described in Section
9
12 of the Settlement Agreement.
10
The parties jointly request that the Court retain jurisdiction over this action solely for purposes
11
of enforcing the Settlement Agreement. A proposed order is submitted herewith.
12
Dated: June 5, 2019
COOLEY LLP
13
14
By: /s/ Whitty Somvichian
15
Whitty Somvichian (194463)
Attorneys for Plaintiff Google LLC
16
17
SYVERSON, LESOWITZ & GEBELIN LLP
18
By: /s/ Scott Lesowitz
19
20
Scott Lesowitz (261759)
Attorney for Defendant Kydia Inc.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2.
STIPULATION TO DISMISS
CASE NO. 18-CV-03047-NC
1
2
3
4
[Proposed] ORDER
Whereas the parties have entered into a settlement agreement on June 3, 2019 to resolve this
action (the “Settlement Agreement”), the Court hereby ORDERS:
1.
The complaint filed by Plaintiff Google LLC (“Google”) against Defendant Kydia Inc.
5
d/b/a BeyondMenu (“Kydia”) is hereby dismissed without prejudice and subject to Google’s subject
6
to Google’s ability to seek enforcement of the Settlement Agreement as described in Section 12 of the
7
Settlement Agreement;
8
9
2.
The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action solely for purposes of enforcing the
terms and remedies of the Settlement Agreement.
10
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
Dated: ____________________
June 5, 2019
15
thanael M
Judge Na
TED
17
RT
ER
19
20
A
H
18
. Cousins
LI
16
R NIA
14
GRAN
NO
The Honorable Nathanael Cousins
United States Magistrate Judge
UNIT
ED
13
RT
U
O
S DISTRICT
TE
C
___________________________________
TA
12
FO
11
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3.
STIPULATION TO DISMISS
CASE NO. 18-CV-03047-NC
1
ATTESTATION
2
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, Whitty Somvichian, attest that
3
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I
4
declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is
5
true and correct. Executed this 5th day of June, 2019, at San Francisco, California.
6
7
/s/ Whitty Somvichian
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4.
STIPULATION TO DISMISS
CASE NO. 18-CV-03047-NC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?