Rodriguez v. BCForward Razor LLC et al
Filing
49
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class and Collective Action Settlement, Approval of Class Notice, and Setting Final Approval Hearing. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/12/2019. (ejdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DAVID YEREMIAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
David Yeremian (SBN 226337)
David@yeremianlaw.com
Jason Rothman (SBN 304961)
Jason@yeremianlaw.com
535 N. Brand Blvd., Suite 705
Glendale, California 91203
Telephone: (818) 230-8380
Facsimile: (818) 230-0308
UNITED EMPLOYEES LAW GROUP, PC
Walter Haines (SBN 71075)
whaines@uelg.com
5500 Bolsa Ave., Suite 201
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Telephone: (310) 652-2242
Attorneys for Plaintiff Jesse Rodriguez,
on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13 JESSE RODRIGUEZ, an individual, on behalf Case No.: 5:18-cv-03219-EJD
14
of himself and others similarly situated,
[Assigned for all purposes to the Honorable
Edward J. Davila]
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Plaintiffs,
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS
AND COLLECTIVE ACTION
BCFORWARD RAZOR LLC, an Indiana
SETTLEMENT, APPROVAL OF CLASS
Limited Liability Company, BUCHER AND
CHRISTIAN CONSULTING, INC., an Indiana NOTICE, AND SETTING FINAL
APPROVAL HEARING
Corporation; and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
[Filed concurrently with Notice of Motion;
Memorandum; and Declaration of David
Defendants.
Yeremian]
vs.
Hearing:
Time:
Dept.:
June 13, 2019
9:00 a.m.
1
24
25
26
27
28
-1ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
1
ORDER
12
On June 13, 2019, this Court conducted a hearing on Plaintiff Jesse Rodriguez’s
2
3
(“Plaintiff”) Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class and Collective Action Settlement (the
4
“Motion”). Having considered the Motion and the points and authorities and declarations
5
submitted in support of the Motion, including the Stipulation of Settlement and Release
6
(“Settlement Agreement” or “Settlement”) and GOOD CAUSE appearing, IT IS HEREBY
7
ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED, subject to the following findings and orders:
8
9
10
11
1.
All initial-capped terms contained herein shall have the same definitions as set
forth the Settlement Agreement, which is attached as Exhibit A to the declaration of Plaintiff’s
counsel, David Yeremian, filed in support of the unopposed motion for preliminary approval.
2.
The Settlement Class shall be conditionally certified for settlement purposes only and shall
12
consist of all non-exempt Customer Service Representatives, Application Support Specialists,
13
Contact Center Agents, Customer Support Agents, Subscription Support Agents, Customer
14
Service Agents, Incubation Specialists, Product Specialist Support Agents, Premium Customer
15
Service Representatives, Renewals Specialists, Developer Support Operations Specialists, App
16
Technical Supports, Technical Support Analysts, Application Review Analysts and In-Store Tech
17
Supports who have provided resources to Accenture LLP through their employment with
18
BCForward Razor LLC in California from April 23, 2014 through April 30, 2019 (the “Class
19
Period”). The Court recognizes that certification under this Order is for settlement purposes only,
20
and shall not constitute or be construed as an admission by Defendants that this action is
21
appropriate for class, collective or representative treatment for litigation purposes. Entry of this
22
Order is without prejudice to the rights of Defendant to oppose certification of a class in this
23
action should the proposed settlement not be granted final approval.
24
3. The Settlement Class shall be conditionally certified for settlement purposes only and
25
pursuant to Rules 23(a) and 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 29 U.S.C. section
26
201, et seq., and shall not constitute or be construed as an admission by Defendants that this action
27
is appropriate for class, collective or representative treatment for litigation purposes. Entry of this
28
Order is without prejudice to the rights of Defendants to oppose certification of a class in this
-2ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
1
2
action should the proposed settlement not be granted final approval.
4.
Considering the factors set forth in Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp., 150 F.3d 1011, 1026
3
(9th Cir. 1998), the Court further finds that, for purposes of preliminary approval, and considering:
4
the strength of the allegations set forth in Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint; the strength of
5
Defendants’ defenses to those claims; the risk, expense, complexity, and likely duration of further
6
litigation; the risk of obtaining and/or maintaining class action status throughout the litigation; the
7
extent of discovery completed and the stage of the proceedings; the experience and views of
8
counsel; the presence and/or absence of a governmental participant; and the amount offered in
9
settlement of the claims, the proposed Settlement Agreement is fair on its face. The Court
10
therefore finds on a preliminary basis that the proposed terms of the Settlement Agreement set
11
forth in Exhibit A to the Declaration of David Yeremian are reasonable, and grants preliminary
12
approval of the proposed Settlement.
13
5.
The Court also finds, on a preliminary basis, that the Settlement is fair, adequate
14
and reasonable to the Settlement Class Members and within the range of reasonableness when
15
balanced against the probable outcome of further litigation relating to class action certification,
16
liability, and damages issues, and potential appeals of rulings. The Court further finds that
17
Plaintiff’s counsel conducted extensive investigation and research and informal discovery have
18
been conducted such that they were able to reasonably evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of
19
Plaintiff’s claims and the ability to certify them. The Court further finds that settlement at this time
20
will avoid substantial costs, delay, and risks that would be presented by the further prosecution of
21
the litigation.
22
6.
Based on a review of the papers submitted by the Parties, the Court finds that the
23
Settlement Agreement is the result of arms-length negotiations conducted after Plaintiff’s counsel
24
had adequately investigated the claims and become familiar with the strengths and weaknesses of
25
the claims. The assistance of an experienced mediator in the settlement process supports the
26
Court’s conclusion that the proposed settlement is non-collusive. The Court finds on a preliminary
27
basis that the Settlement is within the range of reasonableness of a settlement that could ultimately
28
be given final approval by this Court, and hereby grants preliminary approval of the Settlement.
-3ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
1
7.
The Court preliminarily approves the Settlement Agreement, including all of the
2
terms and conditions set forth therein and the Maximum Settlement Amount and allocation of
3
payments.
4
5
6
7
8
9
8.
The Court conditionally appoints Plaintiff Jesse Rodriguez to represent the
Settlement Class Members for settlement purposes only.
9.
The Court conditionally appoints David Yeremian, Esq., and David Yeremian &
Associates, Inc., as counsel for the Settlement Class Members for settlement purposes only.
10.
The Court appoints ILYM Group, Inc. as the Claims Administrator and
preliminarily approves the allocated Settlement Administration expenses. The Claims
10
Administrator will prepare final versions of the Class Notice, incorporating into it the relevant
11
dates and deadlines set forth in this Order and the Settlement Agreement, and will carry out the
12
notice procedures set forth in the Settlement Agreement.
13
11.
The Court concludes that the Class Notice, at Exhibit 1 to the Settlement
14
Agreement, as well as the procedure set forth in the Settlement Agreement for providing notice to
15
the Settlement Class Members will provide the best notice practicable under the facts and
16
circumstances of this case. There is no alternative method of notice that would be more practical
17
or more likely to notify Settlement Class Members. The Class Notice fairly, plainly, accurately,
18
and reasonably informs the Settlement Class Members of: (a) the nature of the Action, the
19
definition of the Settlement Class Members, the identity of Class Counsel, and the essential terms
20
of the Settlement Agreement, including the plan of allocation; (b) Plaintiff and Class Counsel’s
21
applications for the Plaintiff’s Service Award and Class Counsel’s request for attorneys’ fees and
22
litigation costs; (c) how to participate in and receive proceeds under the Settlement; (d) how to
23
object to or request exclusion from the Settlement; and (e) how to obtain additional information
24
regarding the Action and the Settlement. The Court thus finds that the notice requirements for
25
class and collective actions are satisfied. The rights of any potential Class Members who disagree
26
with or do not accept any terms or conditions of the proposed Settlement are adequately protected
27
in that they may exclude themselves from the Settlement and proceed with any alleged claims they
28
may have against Defendants, or they may object to the Settlement and appear before this Court.
-4ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
1
However, to do so they must follow the procedures outlined in the Settlement Agreement and
2
Notice of Class Action Settlement. Failure to follow the procedures outlined in the Settlement
3
Agreement and Notice of Class Action Settlement for making objections shall result in waiver and
4
the objector shall be forever foreclosed from challenging any of the terms of the Settlement.
5
12.
6
Settlement
7
13.
The Court approves, as to form and content, the proposed Notice of Class Action
The Court directs the mailing, by First-Class U.S. mail, of the Class Notice in
8
accordance with the schedule set forth below and the other procedures described in the Settlement
9
Agreement. The Court finds that the method selected for communicating the preliminary approval
10
of the Settlement Agreement to Class Members is the best notice practicable under the
11
circumstances, constitutes due and sufficient notice to all persons entitled to notice, and thereby
12
satisfies due process.
13
14
14.
Workforce Development Agency, satisfying the requirements of PAGA.
15
16
15.
All proceedings and all litigation of the Action, other than those pertaining to the
administration of the Settlement, are stayed pending the Final Approval Hearing.
17
18
Plaintiff has provided notice of the settlement to the California Labor and
16.
Plaintiff and the Settlement Class Members are prohibited from prosecuting any
claims against Defendants or the Released Parties pending the Final Approval Hearing.
19
17.
The preliminary approval of the Settlement, certification of the Settlement Class
20
Members, and all actions associated with them, are undertaken on the condition that they shall be
21
vacated if the Settlement Agreement is terminated or disapproved in whole or in part by the Court,
22
or any appellate court and/or other court of review in which event the Settlement Agreement and
23
the fact that it was entered into shall not be offered, received, or construed as an admission or as
24
evidence for any purpose, including but not limited to an admission by any Party of liability or
25
non-liability or of the certifiability of a litigation class or the appropriateness of maintaining a
26
representative action.
27
///
28
///
-5ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
1
18.
The following dates shall govern for purposes of this Settlement:
2
Due Date
30 days after the Court
grants preliminary
approval of the
Settlement
Not later than 21
calendar days after
Defendant produces the
class data
14 days before the
deadline for objecting to
the settlement
5
6
7
8
9
Last day for the Settlement Class Members to mail Requests for
Exclusion or Objections to the Settlement
__________, 2019
Sept. 19
4
Activity
Last day for Defendants to produce the Class List to the Claims
Administrator
Not later than 30
calendar days after the
Claims Administrator
mails the Class Notice
3
Deadline for Class Counsel to File Motion for Final Approval of the
Settlement, Declaration from Administrator, and Supplemental
Documents for Fees Motion (28 days before Final Approval
Hearing)
10
Last day for the Claims Administrator to mail Class Notice to all
Class Members
Last day for Plaintiff to file the Motion for Approval of Attorneys’
Fees and Costs and Class Representative Service Award (“Fees
Motion”) and Declaration from Claims Administrator, Class
Representative, and Class Counsel in support
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
October 17, 2019
Proposed Date for Final Approval Hearing and Fees Motion
20
21
In the event the Settlement is not finally approved, or otherwise does not become effective in
22
accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, this Order shall be rendered null and void
23
and shall be vacated, and the Parties shall revert to their respective positions as of before entering
24
into the Settlement Agreement. The Court’s findings are for purposes of certifying a settlement
25
class and to settle the matter and will not have any claim or issue preclusion or estoppel effect in
26
any other action against Defendants, or in this action if the Settlement is not finally approved.
27
///
28
///
-6ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
1
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: __________________
June 12, 2019
_____________________________________
HONORABLE EDWARD J. DAVILA
JUDGE OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-7ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?