Dolby v. Su et al

Filing 15

ORDER GRANTING 14 STIPULATION TO STAY THE ACTION. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 8/10/2018.(blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2018)

Download PDF
1 ROBBINS ARROYO LLP BRIAN J. ROBBINS (#190264) 2 FELIPE J. ARROYO (#163803) STEVEN R. WEDEKING (#235759) 3 600 B Street, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101 4 Telephone: (619) 525-3990 Facsimile: (619) 525-3991 5 E-mail: brobbins@robbinsarroyo.com farroyo@robbinsarroyo.com 6 swedeking@robbinsarroyo.com 7 Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IN RE ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE 11 LITIGATION 12 ____________________________________ 13 This Document Relates To: 14 15 ALL ACTIONS. Lead Case No. 5:18-cv-03575-BLF (Consolidated with No. 5:18-cv-03811) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY THE ACTION Hon. Beth Labson Freeman Courtroom 3, 5th Floor 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY THE ACTION 1 Plaintiffs Jacqueline Dolby and Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust ("Plaintiffs"), 2 individual defendants Lisa T. Su, Devinder Kumar, John E. Caldwell, Nicholas M. Donofrio, 3 Ahmed Yahia, Nora M. Denzel, Michael J. Inglis, Joseph A. Householder, John W. Marren, 4 Abhi Y. Talwalkar, Mark Durcan, and Bruce L. Claflin (the "Individual Defendants"), and 5 nominal defendant Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ("AMD" or the "Company," together with 6 Individual Defendants, the "Defendants") (Plaintiffs and Defendants are collectively referred to 7 herein as the "Parties"), hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 8 WHEREAS, on June 14 and 26, 2018, two stockholder derivative actions were filed in 9 this Court, on behalf of AMD; 10 WHEREAS, on July 6, 2018, the Parties submitted a stipulation and proposed order 11 consolidating the two related stockholder derivative actions and appointing lead counsel (Dkt. 12 No. 8); 13 WHEREAS, on July 12, 2018, the Court consolidated the two stockholder derivative 14 actions (this "Derivative Action") (Dkt. No. 10); 15 WHEREAS, the deadline for Plaintiffs to file a consolidated complaint in the Derivative 16 Action is August 13, 2018; 17 WHEREAS, there is a related securities class action pending in the Northern District of 18 California before the Honorable Edward J. Davila, captioned Kim v. Advanced Micro Devices, 19 Inc., et al., No. 5:18-cv-00321-EJD, (the "Securities Class Action"); 20 WHEREAS, a briefing schedule has been ordered for anticipated motions to dismiss in 21 the Securities Class Action providing for a hearing date on the motions to dismiss of January 17, 22 2019; 23 WHEREAS, while this is a derivative action asserting different claims for liability on 24 behalf of (rather than against) AMD, it involves some of the same parties as and some factual 25 overlap with the Securities Class Action; 26 WHEREAS, while Plaintiffs believe that that the derivative claims are not dependent on 27 and have merit independent of the Securities Class Action and Defendants do not agree, the 28 -1STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY THE ACTION 1 Parties agree a ruling on the scheduled motions to dismiss in the Securities Class Action may 2 help inform the manner in which the Derivative Action proceeds; 3 WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties have met and conferred and, given the circumstances 4 of this case, in the interests of judicial efficiency, and to preserve the Company's and the Court's 5 resources, agree that a stay of this Derivative Action on the terms set forth herein, subject to this 6 Court's approval, until a decision is rendered on the scheduled motions to dismiss in the 7 Securities Class Action, is appropriate and in the Company's best interests; 8 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs shall be permitted to file a consolidated complaint 9 notwithstanding the agreed-to stay, but Defendants need not respond to any such complaint 10 during the pendency of the stay; and 11 NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned Parties hereby stipulate and agree, and 12 respectfully request that the Court enter an Order as follows: 13 1. In light of the foregoing considerations, good cause exists for a stay of this 14 Derivative Action pending a ruling on the scheduled motions to dismiss in the Securities Class 15 Action. 16 2. All proceedings and deadlines in this action are stayed until further order of the 17 Court or except as otherwise provided herein. 18 3. The Parties will file a joint status report with the Court every 120 days with an 19 update regarding the proceedings in the Securities Class Action. 20 4. Defendants' counsel shall inform Plaintiffs' counsel of the occurrence of the ruling 21 on the motions to dismiss in the Securities Class Action within seven (7) days of such 22 occurrence. 23 5. Within twenty-one (21) days after the ruling on the motions to dismiss in the 24 Securities Class Action, the Parties in this Derivative Action will meet and confer in good faith 25 to determine a schedule for further proceedings in the Derivation Action, and will submit a 26 proposed scheduling stipulation for this Court's review and approval. 27 28 -2STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY THE ACTION 1 6. If Defendants become aware of any other stockholder derivative proceedings 2 initiated on behalf of AMD based on the same or a similar set of facts alleged in this Derivative 3 Action, then the Company shall notify counsel for Plaintiffs promptly. 4 7. In the event that during the pendency of the stay the Company provides Company 5 documents to any other AMD stockholder in connection with another stockholder derivative 6 action on behalf of AMD based on the materially same set of facts alleged in this Derivative 7 Action, the Company agrees to offer to provide those documents to Plaintiffs pursuant to the 8 same confidentiality and use terms previously agreed to by the Company and such other 9 stockholder except for use terms that expressly conflict with Plaintiffs' desire to litigate in this 10 forum. 11 8. In the event that the Company receives a demand for the inspection of books and 12 records of AMD based on the materially same set of facts alleged in this Derivative Action, the 13 Company agrees to notify Plaintiffs within twenty-one (21) days. 14 9. In the event that during the pendency of the stay the Company provides Company 15 documents to any other AMD stockholder in connection with a demand for the inspection of 16 books and records of AMD based on the materially same set of facts alleged in this Derivative 17 Action, the Company agrees to provide those documents to Plaintiffs pursuant to the same 18 confidentiality and use terms previously agreed to by the Company and such other stockholder 19 except for use terms that expressly conflict with Plaintiffs' desire to litigate in this forum. 20 10. At any time during which the Derivative Action is stayed pursuant to this Order, 21 any party may file a motion with the Court seeking to modify the terms of the Order or lift the 22 stay, which may be opposed by any other party. 23 24 25 26 August 10, 2018 Respectfully submitted, ROBBINS ARROYO LLP BRIAN J. ROBBINS FELIPE J. ARROYO STEVEN R. WEDEKING 27 /s/ Steven R. Wedeking STEVEN R. WEDEKING 28 -3- STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY THE ACTION 600 B Street, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 525-3990 Facsimile: (619) 525-3991 E-mail: brobbins@robbinsarroyo.com farroyo@robbinsarroyo.com swedeking@robbinsarroyo.com 1 2 3 4 Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 5 6 August 10, 2018 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP MATTHEW W. CLOSE 7 /s/ Matthew W. Close MATTHEW W. CLOSE 8 10 400 South Hope Street, 18th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 430-6000 E-mail: mclose@omm.com 11 Counsel for Defendants 9 12 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 13 I, Steven R. Wedeking, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used 14 15 16 17 to file the foregoing Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Stay the Action. In compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. 18 19 Dated: August 10, 2018 20 /s/ Steven R. Wedeking STEVEN R. WEDEKING **** 21 22 ORDER 23 24 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 DATED: _______________________ August 10, 2018 27 28 ______________________________________ HON. BETH LABSON FREEMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1282323 -4STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY THE ACTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?