Zhao v. Nielsen et al
Filing
15
STIPULATION TO DISMISS AND ORDER 14 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 10/9/2018. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2018)
1 ALEX G. TSE (CABN 152348)
United States Attorney
2
SARA WINSLOW (DC Bar No. 457643)
3 Chief, Civil Division
Assistant United States Attorney
4
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102-3495
5
Telephone: (415) 436-6925
FAX: (415) 436-6748
6
Sara.winslow@usdoj.gov
7
Attorneys for Defendants
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
ZIWEI ZHAO,
C 18-03728 NC
Plaintiff,
13
15
16
STIPULATION TO DISMISS and
ORDER
v.
14
KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security, et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
Plaintiff, by and through her attorney of record, and Defendants, by and through their attorneys
19
20 of record, hereby stipulate, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), to dismissal of the above-entitled
21 action without prejudice in light of the fact that the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
22 adjudicated Plaintiff’s application to adjust to permanent resident status application.
23 ///
24 ///
25
26
27
28
STIP TO DISMISS AND ORDER
C 18-03728 NC
1
1
Each of the parties shall bear their own costs and fees.
2 Date: October 9, 2018
Respectfully submitted,
3
ALEX G. TSE
United States Attorney
4
/s/
SARA WINSLOW
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendants
5
6
7
8
9 Dated:
see attached
JONATHAN M. GENISH
Attorney for Plaintiff
10
11
12
13
ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
ISTRIC
ES D
15 Date: October 9, 2018
18
GRAN
NO
17
thanael M
Judge Na
TED
R NIA
UNIT
ED
S
16
RT
U
O
TC
___________________________
AT
T
NATHANAEL COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
RT
21
ER
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP TO DISMISS AND ORDER
C 18-03728 NC
2
A
H
22
. Cousins
LI
20
FO
19
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?