In the Matter of the Complaint Ocean Angel V, LLC
Filing
48
Order Directing Plaintiff-in-Limitation to Post Bond. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/7/2021. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2021)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
8
9
Case No. 5:19-cv-02794-EJD
IN RE THE MATTER OF THE
COMPLAINT OF OCEAN ANGEL V,
LLC
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF-INLIMITATION TO POST BOND
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
On May 22, 2019, Plaintiff-in-Limitation Ocean Angel V, LLC (“Ocean Angel”) filed this
14
action in admiralty for exoneration from or limitation of liability. Dkt. No. 1. At that time, Ocean
15
Angel filed an ad interim stipulation of value for $50,000. Dkt. No. 3-3. On March 10, 2021, the
16
Court granted Claimant Robin DeLeon-Piedra’s motion to increase the limitation fund to
17
$1,105,000.00. Dkt. No. 36. De-Leon Piedra moves to compliance with the Court’s March 10,
18
2021 order. Dkt. No. 39.
19
46 U.S.C. § 30511 of the Limitation of Liability Act provides that a vessel owner who has
20
brought a civil action for limitation of liability in district court shall either (at the owner’s option):
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(1) deposit with the court, for the benefit of claimants —
(A) an amount equal to the value of the owner’s interest in
the vessel and pending freight, or approved security; and
(B) an amount, or approved security, that the court may fix
from time to time as necessary to carry out this chapter; or
(2) transfer to a trustee appointed by the court, for the benefit of
claimants —
(A) the owner’s interest in the vessel and pending freight;
and
Case No.: 5:19-cv-02794-EJD
ORDER TO POST BOND
1
1
(B) an amount, or approved security, that the court may fix
from time to time as necessary to carry out this chapter.
2
3
Id. § 30511(b). Consistent with § 30511, Supplemental Admiralty Rule F of the Federal Rules of
4
Civil Procedure provides that:
5
[t]he owner (a) shall deposit with the court, for the benefit of
claimants, a sum equal to the amount or value of the owner’s interest
in the vessel and pending freight, or approved security therefor, and
in addition such sums, or approved security therefor, as the court
may from time to time fix as necessary to carry out the provisions of
the statutes as amended . . . . The plaintiff shall also give security for
costs and, if the plaintiff elects to give security, for interest at the
rate of 6 percent per annum from the date of the security.
6
7
8
9
Fed. R. Civ. P. Suppl. AMC Rule F(1) (emphasis added). To date, Ocean Angel has not deposited
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
any security with the Court but instead has only filed an updated ad interim stipulation of value for
12
$1,055,000, which it contends moots DeLeon-Piedra’s motion to compel. Dkt. Nos. 40, 41.
13
DeLeon-Piedra asserts that her motion to compel is not moot, as Ocean Angel has not deposited
14
any security with the Court or posted a bond. Dkt. No. 47.
Ocean Angel’s updated ad interim stipulation of value states that it agrees “[t]o abide by all
15
16
orders of the Court” and “[u]pon demand, to cause to be filed a bond in form and sufficiency of
17
surety satisfactory to this Court . . . .” Dkt. No. 40 ¶ 2. The Court construes DeLeon-Piedra’s
18
motion and statement concerning that motion as such a demand. Accordingly, the Court
19
ORDERS Ocean Angel to deposit with the Clerk of the Court a bond in the amount of
20
$1,105,000.001 by June 21, 2021.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
Dated: June 7, 2021
23
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
The Court’s March 10, 2021 order increased the preexisting $50,000 limitation fund by
$1,055,000 to a total fund amount of $1,105,000. Ocean Angel’s updated ad interim stipulation
incorrectly lists $1,055,000 as the total amount. Compare Dkt. No. 36 at 9 with Dkt. No. 40 at 1.
1
Case No.: 5:19-cv-02794-EJD
ORDER TO POST BOND
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?