Kumandan et al v. Google LLC et al

Filing 279

ORDER granting 242 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 9/16/2022. (svklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2022)

Download PDF
Case 5:19-cv-04286-BLF Document 279 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 14 15 16 17 Case No.: 5:19-cv-04286-BLF IN RE GOOGLE ASSISTANT PRIVACY LITIGATION [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL 18 19 20 21 22 23 The Court, having considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether 24 Defendants’ Material Should Be Sealed (ECF No. 242, “Motion to Seal”), Defendant’s 25 Statement in Support of the Motion to Seal, and the Declaration of Françoise Beaufays submitted 26 in support, finds that good cause exists to seal this material: 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 19-cv-04286-BLF Case 5:19-cv-04286-BLF Document 279 Filed 09/16/22 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 Document 8 Basis for Sealing Portion of Document Aug. 19, Discovery Letter Brief (ECF No. 242-2) Highlighted portions at Confidential and highly sensitive page 2:13-19; 4:11-12; proprietary and commercial information 4:14-17; 4:22-25; 5:1-2; about the operation of Google Assistant. and 5:14-20 Aug. 19, Discovery Letter Brief (ECF No. 242-2) Highlighted portions at page 5:25-6:2 and 6:4-5 6 7 Text to be Sealed Confidential and highly sensitive proprietary and commercial information about details of Google’s understanding of the profits or losses associated with Google Assistant. 9 10 11 The above material shall remain under seal. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 /// 15 16 16, 2022 Dated: September _________________ ____________________________________ HONORABLE SUSAN VAN KEULEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 19-cv-04286-BLF 1 158097671.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?