Kumandan et al v. Google LLC et al
Filing
375
Order for Supplemental Briefing following Hearing. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 1/24/2023. (svklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2023)
Case 5:19-cv-04286-BLF Document 375 Filed 01/24/23 Page 1 of 1
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
IN RE GOOGLE ASSISTANT PRIVACY
LITIGATION.
5
Case No. 19-cv-04286-BLF (SVK)
ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING FOLLOWING HEARING
6
7
8
Pursuant to the order by the Hon. Beth Labson Freeman to revisit the scope of the
United States District Court
Northern District of California
9
10
sampling order in place in this action, as well as the Parties’ submissions on whether the scope
11
should be revisited, a hearing was held on January 24, 2023. Dkt. 331, 368, 369, 370. Following
12
argument by both sides, the undersigned ordered supplemental briefing as follows:
13
•
No later than February 7, 2023, Google is to file i) a chart that identifies categories, by
14
bates ranges and general descriptions, including time frames, of all documents produced in
15
this action that quantify or estimate false accepts and/or audio recordings sent to human
16
reviewers for the relevant class period. The chart must have columns for Plaintiffs’
17
response and be provided to Plaintiffs as a Word document; and ii) a brief not to exceed 5
pages addressing the need for a sampling plan, modified or otherwise, in light of the class
18
certification order.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
•
No later than February 21, 2023, Plaintiffs are to file i) responses to Google’s identified
document categories in the chart provided. Plaintiffs are to email the final chart as a Word
document to SvKCRD@cand.uscourts.gov; and ii) a brief not to exceed 5 pages
addressing the need for a sampling plan, modified or otherwise, in light of the class
certification order.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 24, 2023
SUSAN VAN KEULEN
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?