Kumandan et al v. Google LLC et al

Filing 375

Order for Supplemental Briefing following Hearing. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 1/24/2023. (svklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2023)

Download PDF
Case 5:19-cv-04286-BLF Document 375 Filed 01/24/23 Page 1 of 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 IN RE GOOGLE ASSISTANT PRIVACY LITIGATION. 5 Case No. 19-cv-04286-BLF (SVK) ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING FOLLOWING HEARING 6 7 8 Pursuant to the order by the Hon. Beth Labson Freeman to revisit the scope of the United States District Court Northern District of California 9 10 sampling order in place in this action, as well as the Parties’ submissions on whether the scope 11 should be revisited, a hearing was held on January 24, 2023. Dkt. 331, 368, 369, 370. Following 12 argument by both sides, the undersigned ordered supplemental briefing as follows: 13 • No later than February 7, 2023, Google is to file i) a chart that identifies categories, by 14 bates ranges and general descriptions, including time frames, of all documents produced in 15 this action that quantify or estimate false accepts and/or audio recordings sent to human 16 reviewers for the relevant class period. The chart must have columns for Plaintiffs’ 17 response and be provided to Plaintiffs as a Word document; and ii) a brief not to exceed 5 pages addressing the need for a sampling plan, modified or otherwise, in light of the class 18 certification order. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • No later than February 21, 2023, Plaintiffs are to file i) responses to Google’s identified document categories in the chart provided. Plaintiffs are to email the final chart as a Word document to SvKCRD@cand.uscourts.gov; and ii) a brief not to exceed 5 pages addressing the need for a sampling plan, modified or otherwise, in light of the class certification order. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 24, 2023 SUSAN VAN KEULEN United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?