Whitley v. Javate, et al

Filing 14

ORDER OF SERVICE; DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR NOTICE REGARDING SUCH MOTION; INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 1/6/2021. Motion for Summary Judgment due by 4/7/2021. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

Case 5:20-cv-00680-BLF Document 14 Filed 01/06/21 Page 1 of 5

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

REGINALD WHITLEY,
United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Plaintiff,

12

v.

13
14

DR. JAVATE ROSANA,
Defendant.

15

Case No. 20-00680 BLF (PR)
ORDER OF SERVICE; DIRECTING
DEFENDANT TO FILE
DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR
NOTICE REGARDING SUCH
MOTION; INSTRUCTIONS TO
CLERK

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42

18
19
20
21
22

U.S.C. § 1983 against medical personnel at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”) where he
is currently incarcerated. The Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended
complaint. Dkt. No. 9. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint which is the operative
complaint in this action. Dkt. No. 13.

23

DISCUSSION

24
25
26
27
28

A.

Standard of Review
A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a

prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a
governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any

Case 5:20-cv-00680-BLF Document 14 Filed 01/06/21 Page 2 of 5

1

cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim

2

upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune

3

from such relief. See id. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). Pro se pleadings must, however, be liberally

4

construed. See Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1988).
To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential

5
6

elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was

7

violated, and (2) that the alleged violation was committed by a person acting under the

8

color of state law. See West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988).

9

B.

10

Plaintiff’s Claims
Plaintiff claims he is disabled and falls under the American with Disabilities Act

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

(“ADA”). Dkt. No. 13 at 3. In early 2002, Plaintiff was shot eleven times and has

12

suffered chronic pain due to those injuries. Id. Plaintiff claims that Defendant Dr. Javate

13

Rosana has acted with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs ever since he

14

began seeing her in September 2017, for chronic pain problems in his leg and foot. Id. at

15

5. He claims Defendant Rosana has “willfully and maliciously, deliberately and

16

unlawfully denied [Plaintiff] of serious needed prescribed medication” because she has a

17

“personal biasness [sic] problem” with him. Id. at 7-8. Plaintiff claims he continues to

18

suffer daily from excruciating pain and can barely perform any normal daily activities

19

without his problems getting worse. Id. at 8. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff states a

20

cognizable § 1983 claim for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against

21

Defendant. See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976).

22

CONCLUSION

23
24

For the reasons state above, the Court orders as follows:

25

1.

The Clerk of the Court shall mail a Notice of Lawsuit and Request for

26

Waiver of Service of Summons, two copies of the Waiver of Service of Summons, a copy

27

of the amended complaint, all attachments thereto, and a copy of this order upon

28

2

Case 5:20-cv-00680-BLF Document 14 Filed 01/06/21 Page 3 of 5

1

Defendant Dr. Javate Rosana at Salinas Valley State Prison (P.O. Box 1050, Soledad,

2

CA 93960-1050). The Clerk shall also mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff.

3

2.

Defendants are cautioned that Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil

4

Procedure requires them to cooperate in saving unnecessary costs of service of the

5

summons and the amended complaint. Pursuant to Rule 4, if Defendants, after being

6

notified of this action and asked by the Court, on behalf of Plaintiff, to waive service of the

7

summons, fail to do so, they will be required to bear the cost of such service unless good

8

cause shown for their failure to sign and return the waiver form. If service is waived, this

9

action will proceed as if Defendants had been served on the date that the waiver is filed,
except that pursuant to Rule 12(a)(1)(B), Defendants will not be required to serve and file

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

an answer before sixty (60) days from the day on which the request for waiver was sent.

12

(This allows a longer time to respond than would be required if formal service of summons

13

is necessary.) Defendants are asked to read the statement set forth at the foot of the waiver

14

form that more completely describes the duties of the parties with regard to waiver of

15

service of the summons. If service is waived after the date provided in the Notice but

16

before Defendants have been personally served, the Answer shall be due sixty (60) days

17

from the date on which the request for waiver was sent or twenty (20) days from the date

18

the waiver form is filed, whichever is later.

19

3.

No later than ninety-one (91) days from the date this order is filed,

20

Defendants shall file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion with

21

respect to the claims in the amended complaint found to be cognizable above.

22

a.

Any motion for summary judgment shall be supported by adequate

23

factual documentation and shall conform in all respects to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of

24

Civil Procedure. Defendants are advised that summary judgment cannot be granted, nor

25

qualified immunity found, if material facts are in dispute. If any Defendant is of the

26

opinion that this case cannot be resolved by summary judgment, he shall so inform the

27

Court prior to the date the summary judgment motion is due.

28

3

Case 5:20-cv-00680-BLF Document 14 Filed 01/06/21 Page 4 of 5

b.

1

In the event Defendants file a motion for summary judgment, the

2

Ninth Circuit has held that Plaintiff must be concurrently provided the appropriate

3

warnings under Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 963 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc). See

4

Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 940 (9th Cir. 2012).

5

4.

Plaintiff’s opposition to the dispositive motion shall be filed with the Court

6

and served on Defendants no later than twenty-eight (28) days from the date Defendants’

7

motion is filed.
Plaintiff is also advised to read Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and

9

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986) (holding party opposing summary judgment

10

must come forward with evidence showing triable issues of material fact on every essential

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

8

element of his claim). Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to file an opposition to

12

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment may be deemed to be a consent by Plaintiff to

13

the granting of the motion, and granting of judgment against Plaintiff without a trial. See

14

Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53–54 (9th Cir. 1995) (per curiam); Brydges v. Lewis, 18

15

F.3d 651, 653 (9th Cir. 1994).

16
17
18
19
20

5.

Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen (14) days after

Plaintiff’s opposition is filed.
6.

The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due.

No hearing will be held on the motion unless the Court so orders at a later date.
7.

All communications by the Plaintiff with the Court must be served on

21

Defendants, or Defendants’ counsel once counsel has been designated, by mailing a true

22

copy of the document to Defendants or Defendants’ counsel.

23

8.

Discovery may be taken in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil

24

Procedure. No further court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2) or Local

25

Rule 16-1 is required before the parties may conduct discovery.

26
27
28

9.

It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to prosecute this case. Plaintiff must keep the

court informed of any change of address and must comply with the court’s orders in a
4

Case 5:20-cv-00680-BLF Document 14 Filed 01/06/21 Page 5 of 5

1

timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to

2

prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

3
4

10.

Extensions of time must be filed no later than the deadline sought to be

extended and must be accompanied by a showing of good cause.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated: _January 6, 2021_________

________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Order of Svc
PRO-SE\BLF\CR.20\00680Whitley_svc

26
27
28

5