IN RE: ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PRIVACY LITIGATION

Filing 154

SECOND ORDER REGARDING JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 2/16/21. Discovery Hearing re Unresolved Issues set for 2/23/2021 10:00 AM in San Jose, - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.u scourts.gov/svk General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (jhfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2021)

Case 5:20-cv-02155-LHK Document 154 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

IN RE: ZOOM VIDEO

8

COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PRIVACY

9

LITIGATION

10

Case No. 20-cv-02155-LHK (SVK)
SECOND ORDER REGARDING JOINT
DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF
Re: Dkt. Nos. 150, 152, 153

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

Following this Court’s order of February 9, 2021 (Dkt. 152) and today’s hearing
addressing the remaining issues in the Parties’ Joint Discovery Brief (Dkt. 150), the Court

14
ORDERS as follows:
15
1.

Third Party Software Integrations

16
a. Marketplace Apps. Regarding the tri-level structure proposed by Plaintiffs, as to
17

level 2 referred to as “marketplace apps,” Plaintiff identified 24 RFPs pursuant to

18
which it seeks a broad swath of information regarding potentially hundreds of
19

marketplace apps. As such, Plaintiffs’ requests are overbroad both as to the

20
information they seek and the universe from which they seek that information.
21
Accordingly, Plaintiffs are to narrow both the specific information they are seeking
22
(e.g., security audit information) and the number of marketplace apps to which they
23
are directing their requests. The Parties are to then meet and confer to reach a
24
compromise on the information to be provided. If the Parties are unable to
25
compromise, the issue may be included in a joint submission to the Court not
26
to exceed 5 pages by noon on Thursday, February 18, 2021.
27
28

Case 5:20-cv-02155-LHK Document 154 Filed 02/16/21 Page 2 of 2

b. SDK Snapshots. Defendant is to produce the agreed upon SDK snapshots as of

1

February 2020, April 2020, August 2020, and November 2020.

2
3

4.

4

a. End-to-end Encryption. The Parties are to continue their meet and confer efforts

5

regarding the search terms. For the reasons discussed at the hearing, the term

6

“encrypt!” is too broad and the term “end-to-end” is too narrow. If the Parties are

7

unable to compromise, the issue may be included in a joint submission to the

8

Court not to exceed 5 pages by noon on Thursday, February 18, 2021.

9

b. Enterprise v. Non-enterprise Customers. For the reasons discussed at the

10

hearing, Defendant’s response to RFP 17 is properly limited at this time to non-

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

enterprise customers.

12
13

A hearing on any unresolved issues, if necessary, will be held on Tuesday, February 23,
2021 at 10:00 a.m.

14
15

Security Misrepresentations1

SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 16, 2021

16
17
18

SUSAN VAN KEULEN
United States Magistrate Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

The remaining disputes are numbered as in Dkts. 150, 152.
2