Brown et al v. Google LLC et al

Filing 377

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2022)

Download PDF
Case 5:20-cv-03664-LHK Document 377 Filed 01/04/22 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 CHASOM BROWN, et al., Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 Case No. 20-CV-03664-LHK ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY; GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 371, 372, 373 17 18 On December 31, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Extension of Time to Complete 19 Discovery. ECF No. 371. Specifically, Plaintiffs asked the Court to extend the close of fact 20 discovery from January 21, 2022 to March 4, 2022; to extend the deadline for opening expert 21 reports from February 11, 2022 to March 18, 2022; and to extend the deadline for rebuttal expert 22 reports from March 4, 2022 to April 15, 2022. Id. at 2. On January 3, 2022, the parties filed a 23 joint stipulation requesting an expedited briefing schedule for Plaintiff’s motion. ECF No. 373. 24 25 26 27 28 The Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Accordingly, the Court DENIES as moot the parties’ request for an expedited briefing schedule. The discovery limits, protocols, and deadlines set by United States Magistrate Judge Susan 1 Case No. 20-CV-03664-LHK ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY; GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER Case 5:20-cv-03664-LHK Document 377 Filed 01/04/22 Page 2 of 3 1 van Keulen or Special Master Douglas Brush shall remain in effect unless specifically altered by 2 them. 3 Additionally, on December 31, 2021, Defendant filed a Motion for Extension of Time to 4 File Answer to Second Amended Complaint. ECF No. 372. Specifically, Defendant asked the 5 Court to extend the deadline to answer the Second Amended Complaint from January 5, 2022 to 6 January 15, 2022. Id. at 1. On January 3, 2022, Plaintiffs filed an Opposition. ECF No. 374. 7 Plaintiffs’ primary argument is that allowing Defendant to file an answer on January 15, 2022 8 would prejudice Plaintiffs because fact discovery was set to close on January 21, 2022. Id. at 4. 9 Because the Court has extended the close of fact discovery to March 4, 2022, Plaintiffs will suffer no prejudice if Defendant files its answer to the Second Amended Complaint on 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 January 15, 2022. Thus, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File 12 Answer to Second Amended Complaint. 13 Accordingly, the Court amends the case schedule as follows: 14 Scheduled Event Date 15 Deadline to Answer Second Amended Complaint January 15, 2022 16 Further Case Management Conference January 26, 2022, at 2:00 p.m. Close of Fact Discovery March 4, 2022 Opening Expert Reports March 18, 2022 Rebuttal Expert Reports April 15, 2022 Close of Expert Discovery May 19, 2022 Last Day to File Motion for Class Certification Motion: May 26, 2022 Opp’n: July 14, 2022 Reply: August 11, 2022 September 22, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. 17 18 19 20 21 22 Class Certification Hearing 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: 1/4/2022 25 26 27 28 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH 2 Case No. 20-CV-03664-LHK ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY; GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER Case 5:20-cv-03664-LHK Document 377 Filed 01/04/22 Page 3 of 3 United States Circuit Judge* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 * 28 Case No. 20-CV-03664-LHK ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY; GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER Sitting by designation on the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?