Emergent BioSolutions Inc. v. Mutual Holistic, Inc.
Filing
21
ORDER GRANTING 18 Stipulated Request for Entry of Consent Decree and Dismissal. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 4/28/2021. (lmhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2021)
2
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
8
&
CROWELL
MORING LLP
Valerie M. Goo (SBN 187334)
vgoo@crowel I .com
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: (213) 622-4750
Facsimile: (213) 622-2690
Molly A. Jones (SBN 301419)
mojones@crowell.com
CROWELL & MORING LLP
3 Embarcadero Center, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 941 I I
Telephone: (415) 986-2800
Facsimile: (415) 986-2827
Virginia Wolk Marino (Illinois Bar No. 629799 I; pro hac vice to be submitted)
vmarino@brinksgiIson.com
Andrew J. Avsec (Illinois Bar No. 6292313; pro hac vice to be submitted)
aavsec@brinksgilson.com
BRINKS GILSON & LIONE
NBC Tower - Suite 3600
455 N. Cityfront Plaza Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60611
Telephone: (312) 321-4200
Facsimile: (312) 321-4299
Attorneys for Plaintif EMERGENT BIOSOLUTIONS INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
EMERGENT BIOSOLUTIONS INC.
vs.
Plaintiff,
MUTUAL HOLISTIC, INC., JOHN
DOES I THROUGH 50, and JOHN DOE
ENTITIES I THROUGH IO,
Defendants.
f
Case No. 5:20-cv-09452-NC
Judge: Hon. Nathanael M. Cousins
Complaint Filed: December 30, 2020
Case 5:20-cv-09452-NC Document 21 Filed 04/28/21 Page 1 of 5
V.
Apr 28 2021
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF
CONSENT DECREE AND DISMISSAL;
ORDER
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF
CONSENT DECREE; [ORDER; CASE NO.
5:20-CV-09452-NC
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CROWELL
& MORI G LLP
I.
2.
3.
4.
6.
-2-
The following Consent Decree is entered by and between Plaintiff Emergent BioSolutions
Inc. ("Emergent" or "Plaintiff"), Defendant Mutual Holistic, Inc. ("Mutual Holistic"), and Mutual
Holistic's officer Brad Moore ("Moore," and collectively with Mutual Holistic, "Defendants"),
having agreed upon a basis for settlement of the matters in dispute and having agreed upon the
entry of this Consent Decree, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed as follows, and the
Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusion of law:
parties hereto.
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over the
Venue properly lies in this District.
Emergent is a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business in
Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Mutual Holistic is a non-profit mutual benefit corporation organized under the
laws of California with a principal place of business in Sebastopol, California.
Moore is an individual with an address c/o Attorney Richard Freeman, 703 2nd
Street,Suite 350, Santa Rosa, CA 95404.
Emergent has for many years used the trademarks and service marks EMERGENT
and EMERGENT BIOSOLUTIONS, alone and in connection with other words and designs (the
"EMERGENT Marks"), in connection with various goods and services, including
biopharmaceutical related products and services.
In addition to its common law rights, Emergent is the owner of numerous federal
trademark and service mark registrations and applications for the EMERGENT Marks, including
but not limited to, Reg. Nos. 3,934,662; 4,020,248; 3,446,708; 5,129,287; 5,211,622; and App.
Serial No. 88/884,324.
Mutual Holistic and Moore have promoted their herbal medicine products and
services, including Respiratory Immune Syrups, under the name and mark EMERGENT
BOTANICALS, without any authorization or consent from Emergent. The EMERGENT Marks
are valid, subsisting and in full force and effect as to Defendants.
Case 5:20-cv-09452-NC Document 21 Filed 04/28/21 Page 2 of 5
5.
7.
8.
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF
CONSENT DECREE; ORDER; CASE NO. 5
20-CV-09452-NC
6
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
IO
II
12
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
14
26
9.
Defendants' use of the name and mark EMERGENT BOTANICALS in
connection with herbal medicine products and services is likely to cause confusion, or to cause
mistake, or to deceive the relevant public and the trade, such that the relevant public and the trade
are likely to believe that Defendants and their goods and services originate with or are related to
Emergent.
Defendants and any of their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys,
successors, related companies and assigns and their business or businesses, and all those in active
concert or participation with them, are hereby permanently enjoined from using the name and
mark EMERGENT BOTANICALS, any mark incorporating the term EMERGENT, or any other
mark confusingly similar to the EMERGENT Marks, in connection with the provision of goods
and services.
11.
Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs incurred in connection with
this action and all rights of appeal are waived.
12.
This Consent Decree may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of which
together shall constitute one original document. Electronic copies of original signatures shall be
deemed to be originally executed counterparts of this Consent Decree.
13.
Subject only to the express restrictions contained in this Consent
Decree, all of the rights, duties and obligations contained in this Consent Decree shall inure to the
benefit of and shall be binding upon Plaintiff and Defendants and their successors and assigns.
Plaintiff and Defendants have negotiated this Consent Decree, and agree that it
shall not be construed against the party preparing it, but shall be construed as if the parties jointly
prepared this [Proposed] Consent Decree and any uncertainty and ambiguity shall not be
interpreted against any one party.
15.
Each signatory of this Consent Decree signing on behalf of another,
warrants that he or she has the authority to sign on behalf of said person or entity and all persons
Case 5:20-cv-09452-NC Document 21 Filed 04/28/21 Page 3 of 5
10.
14.
28
CROWELL
& MORING LLP
ATTPRNn, AT LAW
-3-
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF
CONSENT DECREE; ORDER; CASE NO.
5:20-CV-09452-NC
Case 5:20-cv-09452-NC Document 21 Filed 04/28/21 Page 4 of 5
covered hy this Consent Decn::e, and is l'ully authori/,ed by the party whom he or she represents
f
to enter into Ihc terms and conditions of this l >rorosctll Consent Dc::crec.
+
5
16.
provisions of lhi� Consent Decree. including over an} claim that the Defondants have violated any
term of this Consent Decree.
6
7
8
9
17.
12
Emergent and Defendants herchy respectfi1lly request Iha! this Court promptly
approve ancd hy the Court, it
shall he of nn force and eflcct. and it may not he used in any proceeding for any purpost:.
JO
11
This Court shal I retain junsdiction mer this matter for purposes of enforcing the
1T IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATl<:D.
Dated: March _. 2021
Name:
Title:
14
16
c:Pf)ol �.._, �T l,A.�
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Dated.
�Qk. 2021
CROWELL & MORIN(i I.LP
Bv: ls/r(\fp/1"
--�one
Valerie M. Go
f
,\ttorneys for Plaintif
EMFR(iENT Btosou:T[ONS [NC
, I ll'Ul.,\ l Ul RL.lH.\ I H1K ENTK 'f 1)£ r
ONSPH DF.LHIT. !Of{l)I R CA'-l' NO
5.2!1-( V-094�.1-N(
& MnRtNC LLP
3
4
7
2
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
FILER'S ATTESTATION
ORDER
incorporated herein by reference and is entered as an Order of the Court.
Case 5:20-cv-09452-NC Document 21 Filed 04/28/21 Page 5 of 5
Dated: April 2 f , 2021
THE LAW OF 'JCES OF RICHARD
FREEMAN
Specially appearing on behalf of
Defendants
MUTUAL HOLISTIC, INC. and BRAD
MOORE
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5- I (i)(J) regarding signatures, I attest that the other above-
named signatories concur in this filing.
Dated: April )l_o. 2021
IT JS HEREBY ORDERED that the foregoing Consent Decree is fully
I6
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the Parties for the
17
sole purpose of enforcing compliance by the Plaintiff and Defendant with the terms of the Consent
18
Decree.
19
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon approval and entry of this Consent Decree by the
20
Court this Consent Decree shall constitute a final judgment between Emergent and the Defendants.
21
The above-captioned action against Defendants is dismissed with prejudice and all calendared dates
22
are hereby vacated.
S
UNIT
ED
25
April 28
Dated: ____, 2021
NO
RT
c�owu I.
ER
H
28
Jud
-5-
FO
Honorable Nathanael M. Cousins
ins
l M Cous
United StatesgeMagistrate .Judge
Nathanae
27
LI
26
TED
GRAN
RT
U
O
24
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
R NIA
IT IS SO ORDERED.
A
23
C
N STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF
F
DCONSENTC T O ORDER; CASE NO.
I S T R I DECREE:
5:20-CV-09452-NC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?