Jones v. Runge et al

Filing 13

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 9/7/2021. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

Download PDF
Case 5:21-cv-00281-BLF Document 13 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD ANTHONY JONES, United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Plaintiff, 12 Case No. 21-00281 BLF (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 13 14 KYLE RUNGE, et al., Defendants. 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 19 against the officers at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”). Dkt. No. 1. On May 11, 2021, 20 the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend, to correct various deficiencies. 21 Dkt. No. 10. Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint within twenty-eight days 22 from the date the order was filed and advised that failure to respond would result in the 23 dismissal of the action without further notice to Plaintiff. Id. at 5. Then on June 14, 2021, 24 the Court granted Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time until July 30, 2021. Dkt. No. 25 12. 26 27 28 The deadline has long since passed, and Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint in the time provided. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without Case 5:21-cv-00281-BLF Document 13 Filed 09/07/21 Page 2 of 2 1 prejudice for failure to file an amended complaint. The Clerk shall terminate all pending 2 motions and close the file. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _September 7, 2021___ ________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Order of Dismissal P:\PRO-SE\BLF\CR.21\00281Jones_dis-compl. 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?