Whitaker v. LSH Plus LLC
Filing
22
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. Show Cause Response due by 1/24/2022. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 2/3/2022 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/7/2022. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2022)
Case 5:21-cv-00881-EJD Document 22 Filed 01/07/22 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
BRIAN WHITAKER,
8
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED
LSH PLUS LLC,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 5:21-cv-00881-EJD
Defendant.
12
13
Plaintiff Brian Whitaker filed the present action on February 4, 2021. Dkt. No. 1.
14
15
Pursuant to the Court’s September 2, 2021 Order granting the parties’ stipulation to set aside
16
default and General Order 56, the parties’ last day to conduct a joint site inspection was November
17
1, 2021 and Plaintiff’s last day to file a notice of need for mediation was December 13, 2021. Dkt.
18
Nos. 5, 20. Plaintiff did not file a notice of need for mediation, nor did Plaintiff seek relief from
19
the December 13, 2021 deadline.
20
The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte “to achieve the
21
orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629–33
22
(1962). Plaintiff is directed to file a written response to this order by January 24, 2022 and to
23
appear before the Court on February 3, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. and show cause why this action
24
should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
25
Procedure 41(b). If Plaintiff fails to file a written response by the above deadline, the Court will
26
dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
27
///
28
Case No.: 5:21-cv-00881-EJD
OSC WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
1
Case 5:21-cv-00881-EJD Document 22 Filed 01/07/22 Page 2 of 2
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 7, 2022
3
4
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.: 5:21-cv-00881-EJD
OSC WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?