McCullom v. Keen
Filing
8
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 9/7/2021. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
Case 5:21-cv-01172-BLF Document 8 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
KEVIN L. MCCULLOM,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Plaintiff,
Case No. 21-01172 BLF (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v.
13
14
15
JHON KEEN,
Defendant.
16
17
18
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
19
against Chief Probation Officer “Jhon Keen” of the San Mateo County Probation
20
Department. Dkt. No. 1. On June 28, 2021, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave
21
to amend, to correct various deficiencies. Dkt. No. 7. Plaintiff was directed to file an
22
amended complaint within twenty-eight days from the date the order was filed and advised
23
that failure to respond would result in the dismissal of the action with prejudice for failure
24
to state a claim without further notice to Plaintiff. Id. at 5.
25
The deadline, July 26, 2021, has long since passed, and Plaintiff has failed to file an
26
amended complaint in the time provided. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with
27
prejudice for failure to state a claim. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and
28
Case 5:21-cv-01172-BLF Document 8 Filed 09/07/21 Page 2 of 2
1
2
3
close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: _September 7, 2021___
________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Order of Dismissal
P:\PRO-SE\BLF\CR.21\01172McCullom_dis-compl.
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?