McCullom v. Keen

Filing 8

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 9/7/2021. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

Download PDF
Case 5:21-cv-01172-BLF Document 8 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN L. MCCULLOM, United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Plaintiff, Case No. 21-01172 BLF (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 13 14 15 JHON KEEN, Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 19 against Chief Probation Officer “Jhon Keen” of the San Mateo County Probation 20 Department. Dkt. No. 1. On June 28, 2021, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave 21 to amend, to correct various deficiencies. Dkt. No. 7. Plaintiff was directed to file an 22 amended complaint within twenty-eight days from the date the order was filed and advised 23 that failure to respond would result in the dismissal of the action with prejudice for failure 24 to state a claim without further notice to Plaintiff. Id. at 5. 25 The deadline, July 26, 2021, has long since passed, and Plaintiff has failed to file an 26 amended complaint in the time provided. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with 27 prejudice for failure to state a claim. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and 28 Case 5:21-cv-01172-BLF Document 8 Filed 09/07/21 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _September 7, 2021___ ________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Order of Dismissal P:\PRO-SE\BLF\CR.21\01172McCullom_dis-compl. 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?