Johnson v. Boitano et al

Filing 21

ORDER ON 19 DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO VACATE ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF LIMITED DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 7/19/2021. (svklc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2021)

Download PDF
Case 5:21-cv-01402-SVK Document 21 Filed 07/19/21 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 v. STEVEN F BOITANO, et al., Case No. 21-cv-01402-SVK ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO VACATE ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF LIMITED DISCOVERY Re: Dkt. No. 19 Defendants. Having reviewed Defendant’s request to vacate the Court’s June 30, 2021 order permitting 13 Plaintiff to conduct a limited Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Defendant (Dkt. 18 (the “Discovery 14 Order”)), the Court ORDERS as follows: 15 16 17 1. Plaintiff’s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice is improper under the terms of the Discovery Order and is therefore stricken. 2. Within three (3) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff may serve an amended 18 Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice that complies with the Discovery Order. 19 3. The deadlines set forth in the Discovery Order are extended by 14 days. 20 4. Except as set forth above, Defendant’s motion to vacate the Discovery Order is 21 22 23 denied without prejudice. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 19, 2021 24 25 26 27 28 SUSAN VAN KEULEN United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?