Johnson v. Boitano et al
Filing
21
ORDER ON 19 DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO VACATE ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF LIMITED DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 7/19/2021. (svklc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2021)
Case 5:21-cv-01402-SVK Document 21 Filed 07/19/21 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
SCOTT JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
v.
STEVEN F BOITANO, et al.,
Case No. 21-cv-01402-SVK
ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S REQUEST
TO VACATE ORDER ALLOWING
PLAINTIFF LIMITED DISCOVERY
Re: Dkt. No. 19
Defendants.
Having reviewed Defendant’s request to vacate the Court’s June 30, 2021 order permitting
13
Plaintiff to conduct a limited Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Defendant (Dkt. 18 (the “Discovery
14
Order”)), the Court ORDERS as follows:
15
16
17
1. Plaintiff’s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice is improper under the terms of the
Discovery Order and is therefore stricken.
2. Within three (3) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff may serve an amended
18
Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice that complies with the Discovery Order.
19
3. The deadlines set forth in the Discovery Order are extended by 14 days.
20
4. Except as set forth above, Defendant’s motion to vacate the Discovery Order is
21
22
23
denied without prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 19, 2021
24
25
26
27
28
SUSAN VAN KEULEN
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?