Johnson v. Hoa Nguyen Family LLC et al

Filing 20

ORDER on #17 Amended Administrative Motion for Relief from General Order 56; terminating #16 . Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 6/3/2021. (svklc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2021)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Case No. 21-cv-02574-SVK v. HOA NGUYEN FAMILY LLC, et al., Defendants. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM GENERAL ORDER 56 Re: Dkt. No. 17 Before the Court is Defendants’ amended administrative motion requesting relief from 13 the requirements of General Order 56 (“GO 56”). Dkt. 17. According to Defendants, they have 14 removed or otherwise remedied each of the barriers to access alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint. 15 They therefore ask to be “relieved from the mediation and other requirements of General Order 16 No. 56” and be allowed “to proceed with a motion to dismiss and/or motion for summary 17 judgment” on Plaintiff’s claims. 18 The Court DENIES Defendants’ request to be relieved of the requirements of GO 56. If 19 the parties agree that the claims for injunctive relief have been resolved, they may stipulate to 20 forego the joint site inspection and move directly to settlement discussions. If Plaintiff does not 21 agree that the claims for injunctive relief have been resolved, Defendants can file a motion for 22 summary judgment and then ask for relief from particular GO 56 requirements. However, in the 23 current posture of this case, the GO 56 requirements remain in place. 24 25 SO ORDERED. Dated: June 3, 2021 26 27 28 SUSAN VAN KEULEN United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?