Pojani v. TransUnion, LLC et al

Filing 40

ORDER GRANTING 38 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT; AND VACATING HEARING ON MOTION. Amended Pleading due by 12/2/2021. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 11/18/2021. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2021)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 GREGORY POJANI, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 v. BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES NA, LLC, Case No. 21-cv-02880-BLF ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT; AND VACATING HEARING ON MOTION [Re: ECF 38] Defendant. 12 13 Plaintiff Gregory Pojani filed this action for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act 14 (“FCRA”) on April 21, 2021, asserting claims against four defendants: TransUnion, LLC, 15 Equifax Information Services, LLC, Capital One Bank (USA) National Association, and BMW 16 Financial Services NA, LLC. See Compl., ECF 1. Plaintiff thereafter voluntarily dismissed 17 TransUnion, Equifax, and Capital One. See Dismissals, ECF 28, 34, 36. 18 The last defendant, BMW, has not appeared in the case. Service of process was completed 19 on April 27, 2021. See POS, ECF 8. On October 30, 2021, Pojani filed a motion for leave to 20 amend his complaint to add additional claims for violation of the FCRA against BMW. See Mot. 21 for Leave, ECF 38. BMW has not appeared in this case and has not filed a response to the motion. 22 Under the liberal standard for amendment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), 23 the motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file the amended complaint by December 2, 2021. 24 The hearing on the motion, currently set for March 10, 2022, is VACATED. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: November 18, 2021 ______________________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?