Mackey v. Collins et al.
Filing
9
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 1/17/2023. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
Case 5:22-cv-04340-BLF Document 9 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
MICHAEL MACKEY,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Plaintiff,
Case No. 22-cv-04340 BLF (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v.
13
14
15
C. COLLINS, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
19
against the officers at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”). Dkt. No. 1. On December 5,
20
2022, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend, to correct various
21
deficiencies. Dkt. No. 8. Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint within
22
twenty-eight days from the date the order was filed and advised that failure to respond
23
would result in the dismissal of the action without further notice to Plaintiff. Id. at 5.
24
The deadline has long since passed, and Plaintiff has failed to file an amended
25
complaint in the time provided. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without
26
prejudice for failure to file an amended complaint. The Clerk shall terminate all pending
27
motions and close the file.
28
Case 5:22-cv-04340-BLF Document 9 Filed 01/17/23 Page 2 of 2
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: ___January 17, 2023__
________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order of Dismissal
P:\PRO-SE\BLF\CR.22\04340Mackey_dis-compl.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?