Clark v. Perez-Pantoja

Filing 12

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Granting 11 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Motion for Summary Judgment due by 5/3/2023. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

Case 5:22-cv-04460-BLF Document 12 Filed 01/19/23 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

CHESTER CLARK,
Plaintiff,

12

v.

13
14

SGT. I. PEREZ-PANTOJA,

15

Defendant.

Case No. 22-cv-04460 BLF (PR)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Docket No. 11)

16
17

Plaintiff, a state inmate filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42

18
19

U.S.C. § 1983 against an employee at the Salinas Valley State Prison (SVSP).

20

Dkt. No. 1.1 On November 2, 2022, the Court found the complaint, liberally construed,

21

stated cognizable claims, and ordered the matter served on Defendant. Dkt. No. 5.

22

Defendant was directed to file a dipositive motion or notice regarding such motion. Id.

23

Defendant has filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file a motion for summary

24

judgement. Dkt. No. 11.
Having shown good cause, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall

25
26
1

27
28

This matter was reassigned to this Court on December 27, 2022.

Order of Extension of Time to File Motion for Summary Judgment
PRO-SE\BLF\CR.22\04460Clark_eot_MSJ

Case 5:22-cv-04460-BLF Document 12 Filed 01/19/23 Page 2 of 2

1

file a motion for summary judgment no later than May 3, 2023, which is an extension of

2

120 days from the original deadline of January 3, 2023. Plaintiff’s opposition to

3

Defendant’s motion shall be filed no later than twenty-eight (28) days from the date

4

Defendant’s motion is filed. Defendant shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen (14)

5

days after Plaintiff’s opposition is filed.

6

This order terminates Docket No. 11.

7

IT IS SO ORDERED

8

Dated: ___January 19, 2023____

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Order of Extension of Time to File Motion for Summary Judgment
PRO-SE\BLF\CR.22\04460Clark_eot_MSJ

________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge