Du v. HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DISABILITY PLAN et al

Filing 10

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE; Granting 9 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 6/9/2023. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2023)

1
2
3
4
5

Brian H. Kim (State Bar No. 215492)
James P. Keenley (State Bar No. 253106)
BOLT KEENLEY KIM LLP
2855 Telegraph Ave., Suite 517
Berkeley, California 94705
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

YANPING DU,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16
17

v.
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE
DISABILITY PLAN; MATRIX ABSENCE
MANAGEMENT, INC.; HEWLETT
PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY,

18

Defendants.

19

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 5:23-cv-1351 NC
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE;
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH
PREJUDICE

Plaintiff Yanping Du and Defendants Hewlett Packard Enterprise Disability Plan, Matrix

20

Absence Management, Inc. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (collectively “the

21

parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate that this action shall

22

be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.

23

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

24

///

25

///

26
27

CASE NO. 5:23-cv-1351 NC

28

283821962v.1

1

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE;
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH
PREJUDICE

1

///

2

Date: June 6, 2023

BOLT KEENLEY KIM LLP

3
By:

4
5

/s/ Brian H. Kim
Brian H. Kim
Attorneys for Plaintiff
YANPING DU

6
7

Dated: June 6, 2023

WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

8
9

By:

10
11
12

/s/ Michael Brisbin
Michael K. Brisbin
Attorneys for Defendants
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE
DISABILITY PLAN, MATRIX ABSENCE
MANAGEMENT, INC., and HEWLETT
PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY

13
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

14

Having reviewed the stipulation of the parties and good cause showing, the Court hereby

15
16

GRANTS the parties’ stipulation and hereby ORDERS that this action, Case No. 5:23-cv-1351

17

NC, is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with each party to bear its own fees, costs, and

18

expenses in this matter.

S

Dated:

June 9

, 2023

22

UNIT
ED

TED

GRAN

Judge

H

ER

LI

RT

23
24
25

FO

NO

Hon. Nathaniel Cousins
usins
United States Magistrate
l M. CoJudge
Nathanae
A

21

RT
U
O

20

S DISTRICT
TE
C
A
T

R NIA

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

26
27

CASE NO. 5:23-cv-1351 NC

28

283821962v.1

2

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE;
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH
PREJUDICE