Entangled Media, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc.

Filing 131

FURTHER ORDER by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi re 120 , 130 August 9, 2024 Discovery Dispute re Dropbox Interrogatory No. 5. (vkdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2024)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 ENTANGLED MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 23-cv-03264-PCP (VKD) DROPBOX INC., Defendant. 12 FURTHER ORDER RE AUGUST 9, 2024 DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE DROPBOX INTERROGATORY NO. 5 Re: Dkt. Nos. 120, 130 13 14 The Court has reviewed the parties’ joint status report regarding their respective proposals 15 for resolution of the dispute regarding Dropbox’s Interrogatory No. 5. See Dkt. Nos. 120, 126, 16 130. The Court has also reviewed the asserted patents. Both patents claim priority to the same 17 provisional application, and they share substantially the same specification. See Dkt. No. 102, 18 Exs. 1, 2. 19 Given these considerations, the Court orders as follows: 20 1. Within three court days of this order, Dropbox may identify five invalidity contention 21 charts per asserted patent, each with a single prior art reference per chart (for a total of 10 22 invalidity contention charts); however, four of the prior art references must be the same/overlap as 23 between the two patents, with only one unique prior art reference per patent. 24 2. Within three court days of this order, Dropbox may identify no more than seven total 25 terms or phrases across both patents for which Dropbox asserts an invalidity challenge under 35 26 U.S.C. § 112. 27 28 3. Within 30 days of receiving Dropbox’s identification pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 2 above, Entangled Media will serve a supplemental response to Interrogatory No. 5 addressing how 1 the asserted claims of the asserted patents are valid in view of Dropbox’s identified invalidity 2 contentions and challenges. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 28, 2024 5 6 Virginia K. DeMarchi United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?