Entangled Media, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc.
Filing
131
FURTHER ORDER by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi re 120 , 130 August 9, 2024 Discovery Dispute re Dropbox Interrogatory No. 5. (vkdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2024)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
8
ENTANGLED MEDIA, LLC,
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 23-cv-03264-PCP (VKD)
DROPBOX INC.,
Defendant.
12
FURTHER ORDER RE AUGUST 9,
2024 DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE
DROPBOX INTERROGATORY NO. 5
Re: Dkt. Nos. 120, 130
13
14
The Court has reviewed the parties’ joint status report regarding their respective proposals
15
for resolution of the dispute regarding Dropbox’s Interrogatory No. 5. See Dkt. Nos. 120, 126,
16
130. The Court has also reviewed the asserted patents. Both patents claim priority to the same
17
provisional application, and they share substantially the same specification. See Dkt. No. 102,
18
Exs. 1, 2.
19
Given these considerations, the Court orders as follows:
20
1. Within three court days of this order, Dropbox may identify five invalidity contention
21
charts per asserted patent, each with a single prior art reference per chart (for a total of 10
22
invalidity contention charts); however, four of the prior art references must be the same/overlap as
23
between the two patents, with only one unique prior art reference per patent.
24
2. Within three court days of this order, Dropbox may identify no more than seven total
25
terms or phrases across both patents for which Dropbox asserts an invalidity challenge under 35
26
U.S.C. § 112.
27
28
3. Within 30 days of receiving Dropbox’s identification pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 2
above, Entangled Media will serve a supplemental response to Interrogatory No. 5 addressing how
1
the asserted claims of the asserted patents are valid in view of Dropbox’s identified invalidity
2
contentions and challenges.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 28, 2024
5
6
Virginia K. DeMarchi
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?