Google LLC v. Nguyen et al

Filing 36

ORDER ADOPTING 30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; GRANTING 29 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/27/2024. (ejdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2024)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 GOOGLE LLC, Plaintiff, 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 v. Case No. 5:23-cv-05824-EJD ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; GRANTING DEFAULT JUDGMENT NGUYEN VAN DUC, et al., Defendants. Re: ECF Nos. 29, 30 13 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the entire record in this 14 action, as well as Magistrate Judge Kim’s Report and Recommendation on Default Judgment 15 (“Report”), ECF No. 30. 16 Plaintiff Google LLC initiated this action against Defendants Nguyen Van Duc and Pham 17 Van Thien seeking in part to enjoin them from submitting fraudulent copyright takedown requests. 18 ECF No. 1. After Judge Kim authorized alternative service, ECF No. 19, and Google served the 19 required process upon Defendants, ECF No. 23, Defendants failed to appear or otherwise defend 20 themselves from suit. Google then requested, and the Clerk entered, default. ECF Nos. 24, 25. 21 Subsequently, Google moved for default judgment, ECF No. 26, which Judge Kim denied without 22 prejudice. ECF No. 28. Google then filed a second motion for default judgment. ECF No. 29. 23 Upon reviewing this second motion, Judge Kim issued her Report recommending that default 24 judgment be granted. ECF No. 29. Following the issuance of Judge Kim’s Report, this case was 25 assigned to the undersigned. ECF No. 31. The undersigned ordered Google to serve Judge Kim’s 26 Report upon Defendants to give them an opportunity to reject to the Report. ECF No. 34. Google 27 did so, ECF No. 35, but Defendants did not timely object. 28 Case No.: 5:23-cv-05824-EJD ORDER ADOPTING R&R; GRANTING DEFAULT J. 1 1 Having closely reviewed the Report, the Court finds it to be correct, well-reasoned, and 2 thorough. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report in every respect and GRANTS default 3 judgment in favor of Google. 4 IT IS ORDERED that Defendants and their agents, employees, successors, and assigns, 5 and all other persons acting in concert with or at the discretion of Defendants, are hereby 6 permanently enjoined from the following: 1. Submitting any notifications of copyright infringement or takedown requests to 7 Google based on false assertions of right of copyright ownership. 8 2. Creating or attempting to create any Google accounts. 9 3. Using any Google products or services to promote any of Defendants’ websites or 10 products. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 4. Using any Google products or services to harm or attempt to harm any third parties, 12 including without limitation Google’s Search Ads customers. 13 5. Assisting, aiding, or abetting any other person or entity in engaging or performing 14 any of the activities described in subparagraphs (1) through (4) above. 15 16 17 18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court retains jurisdiction of this action to enforce this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a separate Judgment shall issue, and Google shall 19 serve this Order and the Judgment upon Defendants, in accordance with the service procedures 20 approved in this case, within fourteen (14) days of this Order. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 27, 2024 23 24 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 Case No.: 5:23-cv-05824-EJD ORDER ADOPTING R&R; GRANTING DEFAULT J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?