Jackson v. LinkedIn Corporation

Filing 75

ORDER DISMISSING REMAINING STATE LAW CLAIM FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. Signed by Judge P. Casey Pitts on 1/17/2025. (nmc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2025)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JACQUELINE JACKSON, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 5:24-cv-00812-PCP v. LINKEDIN CORPORATION, ORDER DISMISSING REMAINING STATE LAW CLAIM FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Defendant. 12 13 Plaintiff Jacqueline Jackson brought this action against defendant LinkedIn Corporation 14 alleging violations of the federal Drivers’ Privacy Protection Act (DPPA) and the California 15 Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA). This Court initially had federal question jurisdiction over this 16 lawsuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 because Jackson was pursuing a claim under a federal 17 statute. The Court has now dismissed Jackson’s DPPA claim with prejudice, leaving only her state 18 law CIPA claim. The Court ordered supplemental briefing regarding whether it has jurisdiction 19 over that claim under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) notwithstanding CAFA’s “home 20 state” exception, which requires the Court to “decline to exercise jurisdiction … over a class 21 action in which … greater than two thirds of the members of all proposed plaintiff classes in the 22 aggregate are citizens of the State in which the action was originally filed.” 28 U.S.C. § 23 1332(d)(4). In response to the Court’s supplemental briefing order, Jackson states that she lacks 24 evidence sufficient to show that the class does not fall within the “home state” exception, and 25 agrees that the Court should therefore decline to exercise CAFA jurisdiction over her CIPA claim. 26 Accordingly, the Court will dismiss Jackson’s CIPA claim without prejudice for lack of 27 jurisdiction. The clerk shall close the case. 28 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 17, 2025 3 4 P. Casey Pitts United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?