Watts v. County of Colusa
Filing
4
ORDER OF TRANSFER to Eastern District of California. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 3/27/2024. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
QUINTON WATTS,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 24-cv-01789 NC (PR)
ORDER OF TRANSFER
COUNTY OF COLUSA,
Defendant.
16
17
18
Plaintiff, a former prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. §
19
1983, against the County of Colusa. Dkt. No. 1. The complaint seeks damages for the
20
violation of Plaintiff’s rights during criminal proceedings in the County of Colusa. Id. at
21
3-5. Because the acts complained of occurred in Colusa County, which lies within the
22
venue of the Eastern District of California, see 28 U.S.C. § 84(b), venue properly lies in
23
that district and not in this one. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). The same is true if Plaintiff
24
were to file a habeas petition challenging that state conviction: the traditional venue is in
25
the district of conviction or sentencing, which is also Colusa County. See Habeas L.R.
26
2254-3(b)(1); Dannenberg v. Ingle, 831 F. Supp. 767, 768 (N.D. Cal. 1993); Laue v.
27
28
1
2
3
4
Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968).
Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for
the Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).
The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and transfer the entire file to the
5
Eastern District of California.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
DATED:
March 27, 2024
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order of Transfer
PRO-SE\NC\CR 2024\01789Watts_transfer(ED)
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?