Richardson v. U.S. Attorney

Filing 6

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Eumi K. Lee on 8/28/2024. (lrt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

KEVIN RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 24-cv-04240-EKL
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

Re: Dkt. No. 5
U.S. ATTORNEY,
Defendant.

12
13

Plaintiff, a Nevada state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action under 42

14

U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff was sent a notice that he had not paid the filing fee or submitted a

15

complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). A copy of the Court’s form

16

for applications to proceed IFP was provided with the notice. He was provided twenty-eight days

17

to correct these deficiencies. More than twenty-eight days has passed, and plaintiff has not paid

18

the fee or filed a complete application to proceed IFP. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

19

Plaintiff’s miscellaneous motion (Dkt. No. 5) is difficult to understand and DENIED as meritless

20

and moot. If plaintiff wishes to initiate a court case regarding prison conditions at his Nevada

21

prison, he must file a case in the District of Nevada. He may file a federal habeas petition

22

challenging his conviction after he has exhausted his claims in state court.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 28, 2024

25
26
27
28

Eumi K. Lee
United States District Judge