Buckman
Filing
8
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Eumi K. Lee on 9/25/2024. (lrt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
IN RE TIMOTHY BUCKMAN,
Case No. 24-cv-04512-EKL
Plaintiff,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
8
Re: Dkt. No. 1
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
This civil rights action was filed on July 26, 2024. On that date, the Clerk notified Plaintiff
12
that he had neither paid the filing fee nor completed an in forma pauperis application (“IFP”).
13
Dkt. No. 5. The Clerk also notified Plaintiff that he had failed to file a complaint on the provided
14
“Civil Rights Complaint by a Prisoner” form. Dkt. No. 4. Plaintiff was advised that failure to file
15
a signed complaint and to pay the fee or file the application within 28 days would result in
16
dismissal of the action. See Docket Nos. 4, 5 (“Notices”).
17
Plaintiff did not comply with the Notices and the deadline to do so has passed.
18
Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply
19
with the Notices and for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. of Civ. P. 41(b). Because this dismissal
20
is without prejudice, Plaintiff may ask to reopen the action. To do this, Plaintiff must do the
21
following: (1) file his complaint in accordance with the instructions in the Notices, (2) file a
22
motion with the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page, and (3) either pay the
23
filing fee or file his IFP application.
24
The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and close the file.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: September 25, 2024
27
28
Eumi K. Lee
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?