In re National Security Agency Telecommunications Records Litigation

Filing 196

ORDER setting briefing schedule for plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment in Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc, et al v Bush, et al, 07-109. Signed by Chief Judge Walker on 3/13/07. (vrwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2007)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On October 30, 2006, plaintiffs in Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc, et al v Bush, et al, 07-109, moved for partial summary judgment while the suit was pending before Judge King in the District of Oregon. See Doc #85, 06-274-KI. On November 1, This Document Relates To: Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc, et al v Bush, et al, 07-109 / IN RE: NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS LITIGATION MDL 06-1791 VRW ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2006, Judge King stayed responsive briefing on plaintiffs' motion pending action by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) in MDL-1791. Doc #91, 06-274-KI. The JPML has since transferred the case to this court. // // See Doc #1, 07-109. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 schedule: Accordingly, the court sets the following briefing defendants' opposition to plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment shall be filed on or before April 12, 2007, and plaintiffs' reply, if any, is due April 19, 2007. The court will hear argument on plaintiffs' motion on May 3, 2007, at 2:00 pm, or at such other time as they may arrange with the courtroom deputy, Ms Cora Klein, 415-522-2039. IT IS SO ORDERED. VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?