In re National Security Agency Telecommunications Records Litigation

Filing 702

ORDER in C07-1115 VRW CCR v Bush. The parties are directed to submit to the court, on or before 2/26/2010, a joint status report advising the court of the status of this case, what proceedings are necessary to resolve it and proposing a tentative schedule for such proceedings if applicable. Signed by Chief Judge Vaughn R Walker on 1/20/2010. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On March 31, 2008, the court entered an order herein as follows: "In light of the recent action by the Court of Appeals withdrawing submission of the interlocutory appeal in Hepting v AT&T, 06-0672, the clerk is directed to terminate the submitted motions at docket numbers 253, 270, 273, 295 and 347 of the master docket. At the next case management conference herein, the moving IN RE: NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS LITIGATION This Document Relates To: Center for Constitutional Rights v Bush, C 07-1115 VRW / MDL 06-1791 VRW ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA parties may petition the court to reopen these motions if the circumstances so warrant." Doc #27. MDL Doc #438. Since that date, there has been no case management conference nor any activity in the case by either party. The 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 parties are, accordingly, directed to submit to the court, on or before February 26, 2010, a joint status report advising the court of the status of this case, what proceedings are necessary to resolve it and proposing a tentative schedule for such proceedings, if applicable. IT IS SO ORDERED. VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?