In re National Security Agency Telecommunications Records Litigation

Filing 751

ORDER of USCA (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2010)

Download PDF
In re National Security Agency Telecommunications Records Litigation Doc. 751 Case: 09-16676 09/08/2010 Page: 1 of 2 ID: 7467241 DktEntry: 77 F IL E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SEP 08 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S In re: NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY T E L E C O M M U N IC A T IO N S RECORDS L IT IG A T IO N , T A S H HEPTING; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. A T & T CORPORATION and AT&T, I N C ., Defendants - Appellees, U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-intervenor A p p e lle e . N o s. 09-16676 09-16677 09-16679 09-16682 09-16683 09-16684 09-16685 09-16686 09-16687 09-16688 09-16690 09-16691 09-16692 09-16693 09-16694 09-16696 09-16697 09-16698 09-16700 09-16701 09-16702 09-16704 09-16706 09-16707 09-16708 09-16709 09-16710 09-16712 09-16713 09-16717 09-16719 09-16720 09-16723 Dockets.Justia.com Case: 09-16676 09/08/2010 Page: 2 of 2 ID: 7467241 DktEntry: 77 D.C. Nos. 3:06-cv-00672-VRW M :0 6 - c v - 0 1 7 9 1 - V R W N o rth ern District of California, San Francisco ORDER B e fo r e : Peter L. Shaw, Appellate Commissioner The opposed motion to file an overlength reply brief is granted. The opposed motion to vacate the June 16, 2010 order is granted in part. The provision of the order relieving co-counsel remains in place. The remaining p r o v is io n s of the order are vacated. The motion to file a supplemental reply brief is granted. The opposed motion to file public and redacted versions of the su p p lem en tal answering brief are referred to the merits panel for resolution. The red acted version of the brief shall be provisionally maintained under seal and in cam era pending the panel's resolution of the motion. promo/commissioner/8/30/10

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?