In re National Security Agency Telecommunications Records Litigation

Filing 8

Proposed Order re 5 MOTION to Vacate Administrative Motion of AT&T and Verizon Defendants to Vacate Pending Filing Deadlines in Cases Transferred by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation by Verizon Global Networks, Inc., Verizon Northwest, Inc., Verizon Wireless LLC, American Telephone & Telegraph Co., AT&T Communications, Inc., AT&T Corp., AT&T Inc., AT&T Communications of California, Inc., AT&T Operations, Inc., Cellco Partnership, Illinois Bell Telephone Company, MCI, LLC, New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, SBC Long Distance, LLC, Verizon Communications, Inc.. (Axelbaum, Marc) (Filed on 8/25/2006)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP BRUCE A. ERICSON #76342 DAVID L. ANDERSON #149604 JACOB R. SORENSEN #209134 MARC H. AXELBAUM #209855 DANIEL J. RICHERT #232208 50 Fremont Street Post Office Box 7880 San Francisco, CA 94120-7880 Telephone: (415) 983-1000 Facsimile: (415) 983-1200 Email: WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP Mark D. Flanagan #130303 Elizabeth I. Rogers #226234 1117 California Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 Email: John A. Rogovin (pro hac vice) Randolph D. Moss (pro hac vice) Samir C. Jain #181572 Brian M. Boynton #222193 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20006-3642 Telephone: (202) 663-6000 Facsimile: (202) 663-6363 Email: Attorneys for Verizon Defendants SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP DAVID W. CARPENTER (pro hac vice) DAVID L. LAWSON (pro hac vice) BRADFORD A. BERENSON (pro hac vice) EDWARD R. McNICHOLAS (pro hac vice) 1501 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 736-8010 Facsimile: (202) 736-8711 Attorneys for AT&T Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Case No. M-06-01791-VRW IN RE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS LITIGATION, MDL No. 1791 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION OF AT&T AND VERIZON DEFENDANTS TO VACATE PENDING FILING DEADLINES IN CASES TRANSFERRED BY THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION [Civ. L.R. 7-11 & 6-3] Courtroom: 6, 17th Floor Judge: Hon. Vaughn R. Walker Filed concurrently: 1. Administrative Motion 2. Declaration of Marc H. Axelbaum 3. Declaration of Brian M. Boynton 700516477v3 [Proposed] Order Granting Admin. Motion No. M-06-01791-VRW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants AT&T CORP., specially appearing AT&T INC., AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., SBC LONG DISTANCE, LLC, PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO., AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, AT&T COMMUNICATIONS, INC., AT&T OPERATIONS, INC., NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., VERIZON GLOBAL NETWORKS INC., VERIZON WIRELESS, LLC, CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, MCI, LLC and VERIZON NORTHWEST INC. ("Defendants") have moved pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 6-3 for an order vacating all dates by which the parties in these Multidistrict Litigation proceedings ("MDL") are currently required to file responsive pleadings and/or motion papers until the Court holds its initial case management conference and issues a consolidated case management order. The Court having considered Defendants' Motion and Plaintiffs' oppositions thereto, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT 1. 2. Defendants' Motion is GRANTED. All pending dates by which the parties are currently required to file responsive pleadings and/or motion papers in any case that is or becomes part of this MDL are hereby vacated pending the issuance of a further case management order by the Court. Dated: ___________________, 2006. Hon. Vaughn R. Walker United States District Chief Judge 700516477v3 -2- [Proposed] Order Granting Admin. Motion No. M-06-01791-VRW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?