Vaughn v. Woodford, et al

Filing 43

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION in its entirety.The court denies the petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 . Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 4/18/2011.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tkl)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

FRANK DERELL VAUGHN,

CASE NO. 06-CV-1483-JM (WMC)

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT

Petitioner,

12
vs.
13

OF HABEAS CORPUS
14

J.S. WOODFORD, DIRECTOR,

Doc. Nos. 1, 37, 40
Respondent.

15
16

On August 9, 2011, Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr. entered a Report and

17

Recommendation (“R&R”) in the above-entitled case that thoroughly and thoughtfully

18

analyzed the Petitioner’s claims and recommended denying the writ of habeas corpus. (Doc.

19

No. 37.) Petitioner filed objections to the R&R, restating his previous arguments. (Doc. No.

20

40.) Having carefully considered the R&R, Petitioner’s objections, the record before the court,

21

and the appropriate legal authorities, the court hereby ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety.
Accordingly, the court hereby DENIES the petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. No.

22
23
24
25
26
27

1.)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 18, 2011
Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller
United States District Judge

28
-1-