Kirkpatrick v USA

Filing 2

ORDER dismissing Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255). Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 9/29/06. (mam)

Download PDF
Kirkpatrick v USA Doc. 2 Case 3:06-cv-01857-IEG Document 2 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. vs. LARRY STEVEN KIRKPATRICK, II, Petitioner, CASE NO. 06CV1857 IEG related to 03cr531 ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPTS WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF COSTS and GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW and DISMISSING PETITIONER'S PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE [Doc. Nos. 1009, 1010, 1015 in case no. 03cr531; Doc. No. 1 in case no. 06cv1857] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Presently before the Court is Larry Steven Kirkpatrick's ("petitioner") request for transcripts without prepayment of costs. [Doc. No. 1009 in case number 03cr531.] Petitioner initially requested transcripts in conjunction with Petitioner's petition to vacate, set aside, or correct Petitioner's sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. [Doc. No. 1 in case number 06cv1857; Doc. No. 1010 in case number 03cr531.] Petitioner has since filed a motion to withdraw the petition. [Doc. No. 1015 in case number 03cr531.] // // // -106cv1857, related to 03cr531 Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:06-cv-01857-IEG Document 2 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court GRANTS petitioner's motion to withdraw petitioner's previously filed petition. Therefore, the Court DISMISSES petitioner's petition without prejudice. Furthermore, the Court DENIES AS MOOT petitioner's request for transcripts. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 29, 2006 IRMA E. GONZALEZ, Chief Judge United States District Court -2- 06cv1857, related to 03cr531

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?