Grimes v. Tilton et al

Filing 162

ORDER Dissolving Stay and Issuing Briefing Schedule. Supplemental briefing due by 8/28/10; Plaintiff's Opposition or Notice of Non-Opposition is due by 9/17/10. The Court will then take the matter under submission and will issue its written opinion soon thereafter. Thus, unless otherwise ordered, no appearances are required and no oral argument will be heard. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 7/12/10.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(vet)

Download PDF
Grimes v. Tilton et al Doc. 162 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DENNIS GRIMES, CDCR #V-90377, Plaintiff, vs. JAMES E. TILTON; A. FAVILA; S. JUAREZ; REVEREND STEVE FRANCIS; ALAN HERNANDEZ; GEORGE GIURBINO; V.M. ALMAGER; Defendants. On May 18, 2009, this Court issued an Order granting an application to stay the action pending Defendants' interlocutory appeal of the Court's order denying Defendants' motion for summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds. On June 17, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a memorandum affirming the District Court's denial of Defendants' motion for summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds based on Plaintiff's claim under the Religious Land Use and Personalized Persons Act ("RLUIPA"). The Ninth Circuit remanded the issue of whether Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity on Plaintiff's First Amendment claim. The formal mandate was issued on July 9, 2010. /// 06cv2309 Civil No. 06-2309 BTM (LSP) ORDER DISSOLVING STAY AND ISSUING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court hereby DISSOLVES the stay in this matter issued on May 18, 2009. Defendants are ordered to file supplemental briefing to their original motion for summary judgment relating to the issue of qualified immunity on Plaintiff's First Amendment claims only. This supplemental briefing must by filed with the Court and served on Plaintiff no later than Friday, August 28, 2010. Plaintiff must then file and serve either an Opposition or a Notice of Non-Opposition no later than Friday, September 17, 2010. Plaintiff is also directed to refer to the Court's Order dated August 7, 2008 providing Plaintiff with notice of the rules and ramifications of a Rule 56 motion pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc) and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988). No reply brief is necessary. The Court will then take the matter under submission and will issue its written opinion soon thereafter. Thus, unless otherwise ordered, no appearances are required and no oral argument will be heard. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 12, 2010 Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz United States District Judge 2 06cv2309

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?