Lam v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al

Filing 2

Notice and ORDER for E.N.E. Conf; Early Neutral Evaluation set for 1/16/2007 02:00 PM in Courtroom C before Magistrate Judge William McCurine Jr.. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine Jr. on 12/7/06. (kaj)

Download PDF
Lam v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al Doc. 2 Case 3:06-cv-02621-LAB-WMC Document 2 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an Early Neutral Evaluation of your case will be held on January 16, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. in the chambers of the Honorable William McCurine, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge, 940 Front Street, Courtroom C, San Diego, California, 92101. Absent extraordinary circumstances, requests for continuances will not be considered unless submitted in writing no less than fourteen (14) days prior to the scheduled conference. Pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(c) of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of KIEN LAM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, ) INC., a corporation; PATENAUDE ) & FELIX, a professional ) corporation; DAVID C. SCOTT, an ) individual; and DOES 1 THROUGH ) 10 inclusive, Defendants. Case No. 06cv2621 LAB (WMc) NOTICE AND ORDER FOR EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 06cv2621 LAB (WMc) Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:06-cv-02621-LAB-WMC Document 2 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 California, all named parties, all counsel, and any other person(s) whose authority is required to negotiate and enter into settlement shall appear in person at the conference, shall be prepared to discuss the claims and defenses, and shall be legally and factually prepared to discuss and resolve the case at the Early Neutral Evaluation conference. Full authority to settle means that the individual present at the settlement conference has the unfettered discretion and authority to: 1) fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement options; 2) agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties; 3) change the settlement position of a party; and 4) negotiate monetary awards without being restricted to a specific sum certain. Where the suit involves the United States or one of its agencies, only United States counsel with full settlement authority need appear. As to all other parties, appearance by litigation counsel only is not acceptable. Requests to be excused from attendance for extraordinary circumstances must be in writing and received by the Court at least fourteen (14) days prior to the conference. Failure of required counsel and parties to appear in person will be cause for the imposition of sanctions. Sanctions will include, but are not limited to, the attorney's fees and travel costs of the other parties in the case. In addition, the conference will not proceed and will be reset to another date. All conference discussions will be informal, off the record, privileged, and confidential. Counsel for any non-English speaking parties is responsible for arranging for the appearance of an interpreter at the conference. 2 06cv2621 LAB (WMc) Case 3:06-cv-02621-LAB-WMC Document 2 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In cases where a party is incarcerated at the time of the scheduled conference, arrangements will be made for the incarcerated party to appear telephonically. The parties are required to submit a short Early Neutral Evaluation Conference Statement about the case on a confidential basis no later than seven (7) days before the conference. Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall apply to this case. All discovery shall be stayed until after the Rule 26(f) conference, unless otherwise permitted by Rule 26(f) or court order. In the event the case does not settle at the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference, the parties shall also be prepared to discuss the following matters at the conclusion of the conference: 1. Any anticipated objections under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(E) to the initial disclosure provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(A-D); 2. The scheduling of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference; 3. The date of initial disclosure and the date for lodging the discovery plan following the Rule 26(f) conference; and 4. The scheduling of a Case Management Conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). Plaintiff's counsel shall give written notice of the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference to parties responding to the complaint after December 7, 2006. /// /// /// 3 06cv2621 LAB (WMc) Case 3:06-cv-02621-LAB-WMC Document 2 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Questions regarding this case may be directed to the Magistrate Judge's law clerk at (619) 557-6624. Dated: December 7, 2006 Hon. William McCurine, Jr. U.S. Magistrate Judge United States District Court COPY TO: HONORABLE LARRY A. BURNS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD 4 06cv2621 LAB (WMc) Case 3:06-cv-02621-LAB-WMC Document 2 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO TRIAL BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THIS DISTRICT MAY, UPON THE CONSENT OF ALL PARTIES, ON FORM 1A AVAILABLE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE, CONDUCT ANY OR ALL PROCEEDINGS, INCLUDING A JURY OR NON-JURY TRIAL, AND ORDER THE ENTRY OF A FINAL JUDGMENT. COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE CONSENT OF ALL PARTIES, SHOULD THEY DESIRE TO CONSENT. YOU SHOULD BE AWARE THAT YOUR DECISION TO CONSENT OR NOT TO CONSENT IS ENTIRELY VOLUNTARY AND SHOULD BE COMMUNICATED SOLELY TO THE CLERK OF COURT. ONLY IF ALL PARTIES CONSENT WILL THE JUDGE OR MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO WHOM THE CASE HAS BEEN ASSIGNED BE INFORMED OF YOUR DECISION. JUDGMENTS OF THE U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGES ARE APPEALABLE TO THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS STATUTE AND THE FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE. 5 06cv2621 LAB (WMc)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?