Remery v. Henning et al

Filing 2

Order transferring action for lack of proper venue to the Central District of California, Eastern Division. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 1/17/07. (tkl, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 1/18/2007 (tkl, ).

Download PDF
Remery v. Henning et al Doc. 2 Case 3:07-cv-00034-JM-NLS Document 2 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVEN M. REMERY, CDCR-YA #90710, Plaintiff, vs. REV. JAMES E. HENNING; J. HEARY; GARY PENROD, Defendants. Civil No. 07-0034 JM (NLS) ORDER TRANSFERRING CIVIL ACTION FOR LACK OF PROPER VENUE TO THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, EASTERN DIVISION, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 84(c)(1), 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) AND 28 U.S.C. 1406(a) Plaintiff, formerly incarcerated at the West Valley Detention Center ("WVDC") 20 in Rancho Cucamonga, California, has filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 21 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff claims that an administrative chaplain, a nurse supervisor and 22 a San Bernardino County Sheriff discriminated against him after he was transferred to 23 WVDC from the California Youth Authority, refused his requests for a religious diet, and 24 denied him access to the courts in violation of the First and Eighth Amendments. (See 25 Compl. at 2-5.) Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief as well as general and punitive damages. 26 (Id. at 7.) 27 / / / 28 / / / K:\COMMON\EVERYONE\_EFILE-PROSE\JM\07-0034-trf.wpd 1 07cv0034 Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:07-cv-00034-JM-NLS Document 2 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 2 of 3 1 Plaintiff has not prepaid the $350 civil filing fee mandated by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a), 2 nor has he filed a Motion for Leave to Requesting to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 3 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). 4 5 6 I. Lack of Proper Venue Upon initial review of the Complaint, the Court finds that Plaintiff's case lacks 7 proper venue. Venue may be raised by a court sua sponte where the defendant has not 8 yet filed a responsive pleading and the time for doing so has not run. Costlow v. Weeks, 9 790 F.2d 1486, 1488 (9th Cir. 1986). "A civil action wherein jurisdiction is not founded 10 solely on diversity of citizenship may, except as otherwise provided by law, be brought 11 only in (1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the 12 same State, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions 13 giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the 14 action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there 15 is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought." 28 U.S.C. 1391(b); 16 Costlow, 790 F.2d at 1488; Decker Coal Co. v. Commonwealth Edison Co., 805 F.2d 834, 17 842 (9th Cir. 1986). "The district court of a district in which is filed a case laying venue 18 in the wrong division or district shall dismiss, or if it be in the interests of justice, transfer 19 such case to any district in or division in which it could have been brought." 28 U.S.C. 20 21 1406(a). Here, Plaintiff claims constitutional violations originally arising out of events 22 which occurred at the West Valley Detention Center in Rancho Cucamonga, which is 23 located in San Bernardino County. Moreover, all Defendants are alleged to reside in San 24 Bernardino County; none are alleged to reside in San Diego or Imperial Counties. (See 25 Compl. at 2.) Therefore, venue is proper in the Central District of California, Eastern 26 27 28 Division, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 84(c)(1), but not in the Southern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. 1391(b); Costlow, 790 F.2d at 1488. /// 2 07cv0034 K:\COMMON\EVERYONE\_EFILE-PROSE\JM\07-0034-trf.wpd Case 3:07-cv-00034-JM-NLS Document 2 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 II. Conclusion and Order Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall 4 transfer this case for lack of proper venue, in the interests of justice and for the 5 convenience of all parties, to the docket of the United States District Court for the Central 6 District of California, Eastern Division, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 84(c)(1), 28 U.S.C. 7 1391(b) and 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: January 17, 2007 Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller United States District Judge K:\COMMON\EVERYONE\_EFILE-PROSE\JM\07-0034-trf.wpd 3 07cv0034

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?